231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28269808)
1. Development of a framework for resilience measurement: Suggestion of fuzzy Resilience Grade (RG) and fuzzy Resilience Early Warning Grade (REWG).
Omidvar M; Mazloumi A; Mohammad Fam I; Nirumand F
Work; 2017; 56(3):463-474. PubMed ID: 28269808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance Analysis of Hospital Managers Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS: Iranian Experience.
Shafii M; Hosseini SM; Arab M; Asgharizadeh E; Farzianpour F
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Jun; 8(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 26383216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
Sabahi F
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.
Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey.
Akay AO; Demir M; Akgul M
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):561. PubMed ID: 30167894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 28035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constructing the Indicators of Assessing Human Vulnerability to Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Consensus-based Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach.
Fatemi F; Ardalan A; Aguirre B; Mansouri N; Mohammadfam I
PLoS Curr; 2017 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 28480124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies for controlling violence against health care workers: Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy additive ratio assessment.
Rajabi F; Jahangiri M; Bagherifard F; Banaee S; Farhadi P
J Nurs Manag; 2020 May; 28(4):777-786. PubMed ID: 32104935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches.
Orojloo M; Hashemy Shahdany SM; Roozbahani A
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():1363-1376. PubMed ID: 30857100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urban flood risk warning under rapid urbanization.
Chen Y; Zhou H; Zhang H; Du G; Zhou J
Environ Res; 2015 May; 139():3-10. PubMed ID: 25769509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using expert decision-making to establish indicators of urban friendliness for walking environments: a multidisciplinary assessment.
Chiang YC; Lei HY
Int J Health Geogr; 2016 Nov; 15(1):40. PubMed ID: 27846889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multifunctional resilience of river health to human service demand in an alluvial quarried reach: a comparison amongst fuzzy logic, entropy, and AHP-based MCDM models.
Bhattacharya RK; Das Chatterjee N; Das K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(56):84137-84165. PubMed ID: 35776302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept.
Olabanji OM; Mpofu K
Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03182. PubMed ID: 32021922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research on the urban resilience evaluation with hybrid multiple attribute TOPSIS method: an example in China.
Xun X; Yuan Y
Nat Hazards (Dordr); 2020; 103(1):557-577. PubMed ID: 32412523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision-making framework for identifying regions vulnerable to transmission of COVID-19 pandemic.
Gupta R; Rathore B; Srivastava A; Biswas B
Comput Ind Eng; 2022 Jul; 169():108207. PubMed ID: 35529174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing.
Moslem S; Farooq D; Jamal A; Almarhabi Y; Almoshaogeh M; Butt FM; Tufail RF
Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
