119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28269867)
1. Feasibility of Extracting Key Elements from ClinicalTrials.gov to Support Clinicians' Patient Care Decisions.
Kim H; Bian J; Mostafa J; Jonnalagadda S; Del Fiol G
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():705-714. PubMed ID: 28269867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses.
Fanshawe TR; Perera R
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Jun; 25(3):113-114. PubMed ID: 31315905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient preferences when searching for clinical trials and adherence of study records to ClinicalTrials.gov guidance in key registry data fields.
Schindler TM; Grieger F; Zak A; Rorig R; Chowdary Konka K; Ellsworth A; Pfitzer C; Hodge K; Crandall C;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233294. PubMed ID: 32469901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov.
Stergiopoulos S; Getz KA; Blazynski C
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 May; 53(3):307-317. PubMed ID: 30048602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry to an analysis-ready database of clinical trial results.
Cepeda MS; Lobanov V; Berlin JA
Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):347-8. PubMed ID: 23539114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses.
Pradhan R; Hoaglin DC; Cornell M; Liu W; Wang V; Yu H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():92-100. PubMed ID: 30257185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.
Califf RM; Zarin DA; Kramer JM; Sherman RE; Aberle LH; Tasneem A
JAMA; 2012 May; 307(17):1838-47. PubMed ID: 22550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transparency in ovarian cancer clinical trial results: ClinicalTrials.gov versus PubMed, Embase and Google scholar.
Roberto A; Radrezza S; Mosconi P
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Apr; 11(1):28. PubMed ID: 29636080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.
Wu DT; Hanauer DA; Mei Q; Clark PM; An LC; Proulx J; Zeng QT; Vydiswaran VG; Collins-Thompson K; Zheng K
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26269536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Trial Information Mediator.
Krauth C; Kuchinke W; Eckert M; Bergmann R; Braasch B; Karakoyun T; Ohmann C
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Oct; 63():157-168. PubMed ID: 27515925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatically extracting clinically useful sentences from UpToDate to support clinicians' information needs.
Mishra R; Del Fiol G; Kilicoglu H; Jonnalagadda S; Fiszman M
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2013; 2013():987-92. PubMed ID: 24551389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening.
Pfiffner PB; Oh J; Miller TA; Mandl KD
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111055. PubMed ID: 25334031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient-Population-Problem, Exposure-Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR).
Dawes M; Pluye P; Shea L; Grad R; Greenberg A; Nie JY
Inform Prim Care; 2007; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17612476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Issues in the registration of clinical trials.
Zarin DA; Ide NC; Tse T; Harlan WR; West JC; Lindberg DA
JAMA; 2007 May; 297(19):2112-20. PubMed ID: 17507347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of clinical trial status discrepancies: A cross-sectional study of 10,492 trials registered on both ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register.
Fleminger J; Goldacre B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193088. PubMed ID: 29513684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracting genetic alteration information for personalized cancer therapy from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Xu J; Lee HJ; Zeng J; Wu Y; Zhang Y; Huang LC; Johnson A; Holla V; Bailey AM; Cohen T; Meric-Bernstam F; Bernstam EV; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jul; 23(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 27013523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.
Ni Y; Wright J; Perentesis J; Lingren T; Deleger L; Kaiser M; Kohane I; Solti I
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():28. PubMed ID: 25881112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov recruitment status and actual trial status: a cross-sectional analysis.
Jones CW; Safferman MR; Adams AC; Platts-Mills TF
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017719. PubMed ID: 29025842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Anderson ML; Chiswell K; Peterson ED; Tasneem A; Topping J; Califf RM
N Engl J Med; 2015 Mar; 372(11):1031-9. PubMed ID: 25760355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
