237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28270096)
1. Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle.
VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; O'Connell JR; Cole JB; Bickhart DM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):32. PubMed ID: 28270096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.
VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Sargolzaei M; Wiggans GR; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Sonstegard TS; Connor EE; Winters M; van Kaam JB; Valentini A; Van Doormaal BJ; Faust MA; Doak GA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):668-78. PubMed ID: 23063157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Within-breed and multi-breed GWAS on imputed whole-genome sequence variants reveal candidate mutations affecting milk protein composition in dairy cattle.
Sanchez MP; Govignon-Gion A; Croiseau P; Fritz S; Hozé C; Miranda G; Martin P; Barbat-Leterrier A; Letaïef R; Rocha D; Brochard M; Boussaha M; Boichard D
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Sep; 49(1):68. PubMed ID: 28923017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.
Al-Khudhair A; VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Li B
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4478-4485. PubMed ID: 33612229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle.
Veerkamp RF; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Dec; 48(1):95. PubMed ID: 27905878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of meta-analyses and joint analyses to select variants in whole genome sequences for genomic evaluation: An application in milk production of French dairy cattle breeds.
Teissier M; Sanchez MP; Boussaha M; Barbat A; Hoze C; Robert-Granie C; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3126-3139. PubMed ID: 29428760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing imputation and prediction accuracy for Chinese Holsteins using joint Chinese-Nordic reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Ding X; Zhang Q; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Dec; 131(6):462-72. PubMed ID: 25099946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of rare and low-frequency sequence variants on reliability of genomic prediction in dairy cattle.
Zhang Q; Sahana G; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):62. PubMed ID: 30458700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic relationships based on X chromosome markers and accuracy of genomic predictions with and without X chromosome markers.
Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Strandén I; Lund MS
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):47. PubMed ID: 25080199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction of breeding values for calving performance and body conformation traits in Holstein cattle.
Abo-Ismail MK; Brito LF; Miller SP; Sargolzaei M; Grossi DA; Moore SS; Plastow G; Stothard P; Nayeri S; Schenkel FS
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Nov; 49(1):82. PubMed ID: 29115939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle.
van den Berg I; Boichard D; Lund MS
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):83. PubMed ID: 27809758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.
Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the limited increase in validation reliability using high-density genotypes in genomic best linear unbiased prediction: observations from Fleckvieh cattle.
Ertl J; Edel C; Emmerling R; Pausch H; Fries R; Götz KU
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):487-96. PubMed ID: 24210491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect.
van den Berg I; Bowman PJ; MacLeod IM; Hayes BJ; Wang T; Bolormaa S; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Sep; 49(1):70. PubMed ID: 28934948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
