These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28270463)
41. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment. Treffert DA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients. Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions. Meisel A Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill. Neff RC Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Personality disorder. Government 'sets back civil rights by a thousand years'. Nurs Times; 2000 Jul 6-12; 96(27):12-3. PubMed ID: 11963089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Mental health law bibliography. Wade MD Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1974; 6(1):314-40. PubMed ID: 11661142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis. Loue S Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Civil commitment--due process and the standard of proof. Brent DJ De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):1500-11. PubMed ID: 11664498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Commentary: Involuntary Antipsychotics in Prison—Extending Harper, Contracting Care? Levine HS; Gage BC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 26071505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Placement of children and adolescents following seclusion and restraint actions–a study on family-court approvals of minors in youth welfare, child and adolescent psychiatry and jail according to Para. 1631 German Civil Code]. Kölch M; Vogel H Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2016 Jan; 44(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 26864226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs. Brooks WM Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [The rights of citizens while being delivered psychiatric care]. Trushchelëv SA Voen Med Zh; 2000 Feb; 321(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 10870454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]