These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28270759)

  • 1. Attentional Modulation of Change Detection ERP Components by Peripheral Retro-Cueing.
    Pazo-Álvarez P; Roca-Fernández A; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Amenedo E
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():76. PubMed ID: 28270759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(24):3004-14. PubMed ID: 16153678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Psychophysiology; 2003 May; 40(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 12946115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
    Lai G; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The lasting memory enhancements of retrospective attention.
    Reaves S; Strunk J; Phillips S; Verhaeghen P; Duarte A
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():226-237. PubMed ID: 27038756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding.
    Kuo BC; Rotshtein P; Yeh YY
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 22055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological evidence for different types of change detection and change blindness.
    Busch NA; Fründ I; Herrmann CS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1852-69. PubMed ID: 19580382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 18031856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural processes underlying the orienting of attention without awareness.
    Giattino CM; Alam ZM; Woldorff MG
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():14-25. PubMed ID: 28826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues.
    Gressmann M; Janczyk M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():244. PubMed ID: 27065894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.