182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28270907)
1. [Macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and elongation of the brachial plexus: what is the role of caesarean section?].
Kehila M; Derouich S; Touhami O; Belghith S; Abouda HS; Cheour M; Chanoufi MB
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 25():217. PubMed ID: 28270907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of labour and perinatal complications in case of foetus weight over 4000 g].
Piasek G; Starzewski J; Chil A; Wrona-Cyranowska A; Gutowski J; Anisiewicz A; Pejas-Dembowska R; Malmur M; Krawczyk J; Rudziński R
Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(5-6):326-31. PubMed ID: 17017476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Buttarelli M; Franchi M; Dürig P; Brühwiler H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Aug; 109(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 12860334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-diabetic macrosomia: an obstetric dilemma.
Pundir J; Sinha P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 19358024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antepartum risks of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury for infants weighing 4,200 g or more.
Blickstein I; Ben-Arie A; Hagay ZJ
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1998; 45(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9517796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
Schmitz T
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Maternal risks for newborn macrosomia, incidence of a shoulder dystocia and of damages of the plexus brachialis].
Berle P; Misselwitz B; Scharlau J
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 14528418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnosis and management of dystocia of the shoulder.
Morrison JC; Sanders JR; Magann EF; Wiser WL
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Dec; 175(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 1448731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Sénat MV; Boulogne AI; Deneux-Tharaux C; Fuchs F; Legendre G; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Schmitz T; Lejeune-Saada V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():156-61. PubMed ID: 27318182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Shoulder dystocia: Guidelines for clinical practice--Short text].
Sentilhes L; Sénat MV; Boulogne AI; Deneux-Tharaux C; Fuchs F; Legendre G; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Schmitz T; Lejeune-Saada V
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1303-10. PubMed ID: 26541561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective cesarean section for macrosomia?
Yan JS; Chang YK; Yin CS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1994 Mar; 53(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8174008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fetal macrosomia in Lubumbashi: risk factors and maternal and perinatal prognosis].
Luhete PK; Mukuku O; Kiopin PM; Tambwe AM; Kayamba PK
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():166. PubMed ID: 27303582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obstetric and neonatal outcome of babies weighing more than 4.5 kg: an analysis by parity.
Mocanu EV; Greene RA; Byrne BM; Turner MJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 Oct; 92(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 10996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia.
Boulvain M; Irion O; Dowswell T; Thornton JG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD000938. PubMed ID: 27208913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of obstetric management of women with macrosomic foetuses in two Level 3 maternity hospitals in France and identification of predictive factors for obstetric and neonatal complications.
Larad R; Ishaque U; Korb D; Drame S; Coutureau C; Graesslin O; Sibony O; Gabriel R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jul; 274():34-39. PubMed ID: 35569382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers.
Cordero L; Paetow P; Landon MB; Nankervis CA
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2015; 8(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 26410433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal macrosomia as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia during vacuum extraction.
Herzberg S; Kabiri D; Mordechai T; Haj Yahya R; Chill H; Levitt L; Amsalem H; Ezra Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1870-1873. PubMed ID: 27549142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]