These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28271360)

  • 1. Evaluation of the influence of patient positioning on the reliability of lateral cephalometry.
    David OT; Tuce RA; Munteanu O; Neagu A; Panainte I
    Radiol Med; 2017 Jul; 122(7):520-529. PubMed ID: 28271360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
    Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
    Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Reliability of Anatomic Landmarks based on PA Cephalometric Radiographs and 3D CT Scans in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.
    Bajaj K; Rathee P; Jain P; Panwar VR
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 4(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 27678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?
    Giannopoulou MA; Kondylidou-Sidira AC; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 31495758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors.
    Lin HS; Chen YJ; Lu HL; Lu TW; Chen CC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):62. PubMed ID: 28558778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
    Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
    Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.