BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28271487)

  • 1. GroEL and the GroEL-GroES Complex.
    Ishii N
    Subcell Biochem; 2017; 83():483-504. PubMed ID: 28271487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric "Football" Intermediate.
    Taguchi H
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Sep; 427(18):2912-8. PubMed ID: 25900372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TEM and STEM-EDS evaluation of metal nanoparticle encapsulation in GroEL/GroES complexes according to the reaction mechanism of chaperonin.
    Yoda H; Koike-Takeshita A
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 70(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 33173948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
    Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.
    Sameshima T; Ueno T; Iizuka R; Ishii N; Terada N; Okabe K; Funatsu T
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23765-73. PubMed ID: 18567585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crystal structure of a symmetric football-shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 complex determined at 3.8Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Arakawa T; Taguchi H; Shimamura T
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Oct; 426(21):3634-41. PubMed ID: 25174333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Yoshida M; Taguchi H
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23774-81. PubMed ID: 18567584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nucleotide-dependent complex formation between the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES studied under equilibrium conditions.
    Behlke J; Ristau O; Schönfeld HJ
    Biochemistry; 1997 Apr; 36(17):5149-56. PubMed ID: 9136876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anisotropic intersubunit and inter-ring interactions revealed in the native bullet-shaped chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus.
    Ishii N; Sato T
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2013 Apr; 1830(4):2907-16. PubMed ID: 23313842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding.
    Hayer-Hartl MK; Martin J; Hartl FU
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):836-41. PubMed ID: 7638601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex.
    Madan D; Lin Z; Rye HS
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Nov; 283(46):32003-13. PubMed ID: 18782766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
    Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BeF(x) stops the chaperonin cycle of GroEL-GroES and generates a complex with double folding chambers.
    Taguchi H; Tsukuda K; Motojima F; Koike-Takeshita A; Yoshida M
    J Biol Chem; 2004 Oct; 279(44):45737-43. PubMed ID: 15347650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The affinity of the GroEL/GroES complex for peptides under conditions of protein folding.
    Preuss M; Miller AD
    FEBS Lett; 2000 Jan; 466(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 10648816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chaperones GroEL/GroES accelerate the refolding of a multidomain protein through modulating on-pathway intermediates.
    Dahiya V; Chaudhuri TK
    J Biol Chem; 2014 Jan; 289(1):286-98. PubMed ID: 24247249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-molecule study on the decay process of the football-shaped GroEL-GroES complex using zero-mode waveguides.
    Sameshima T; Iizuka R; Ueno T; Wada J; Aoki M; Shimamoto N; Ohdomari I; Tanii T; Funatsu T
    J Biol Chem; 2010 Jul; 285(30):23159-64. PubMed ID: 20511221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chaperonin GroEL-GroES Functions as both Alternating and Non-Alternating Engines.
    Yamamoto D; Ando T
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Jul; 428(15):3090-101. PubMed ID: 27393305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GroEL Ring Separation and Exchange in the Chaperonin Reaction.
    Yan X; Shi Q; Bracher A; Miličić G; Singh AK; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    Cell; 2018 Jan; 172(3):605-617.e11. PubMed ID: 29336887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Denatured proteins facilitate the formation of the football-shaped GroEL-(GroES)2 complex.
    Sameshima T; Iizuka R; Ueno T; Funatsu T
    Biochem J; 2010 Mar; 427(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 20121703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.