These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28272256)

  • 1. A morphometric study of the middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.
    Feng H; Fang XY; Huang DG; Yu CC; Li HK; Zhao SC; Ge CY; Bai RH; Hao DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(10):e6296. PubMed ID: 28272256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative morphometric study of the subaxial cervical vertebrae end plate.
    Feng H; Fang X; Huang D; Yu C; Zhao S; Hao D
    Spine J; 2017 Feb; 17(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 27713104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine.
    Lou J; Liu H; Rong X; Li H; Wang B; Gong Q
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 142():132-136. PubMed ID: 26852320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A morphological study of lumbar vertebral endplates: radiographic, visual and digital measurements.
    Wang Y; Battié MC; Videman T
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Nov; 21(11):2316-23. PubMed ID: 22743647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphologic evaluation of Chinese cervical endplate and uncinate process by three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions for helping design cervical disc prosthesis.
    Zhu YH; Cheng KL; Zhong Z; Li YQ; Zhu QS
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Sep; 79(9):500-6. PubMed ID: 27236369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.
    Feng H; Li H; Ba Z; Chen Z; Li X; Wu D
    Int Orthop; 2019 Jun; 43(6):1521-1528. PubMed ID: 30091068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates.
    Chen H; Zhong J; Tan J; Wu D; Jiang D
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Jul; 22(7):1570-5. PubMed ID: 23612902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative anatomy of the endplate of the middle and lower cervical vertebrae in Koreans.
    Kim MK; Kwak DS; Park CK; Park SH; Oh SM; Lee SW; Han SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(14):E376-81. PubMed ID: 17572609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphologic analysis of Chinese lumbar endplate by three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions for helping design lumbar disc prosthesis.
    Pan CL; Zhang BY; Zhu YH; Ma YH; Li MF; Wang X; Yang F; Li YQ; Zhu YH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Feb; 100(6):e24583. PubMed ID: 33578557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions.
    Dong L; Tan MS; Yan QH; Yi P; Yang F; Tang XS; Hao QY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 25591562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions.
    Karaca S; Akpolat AO; Oztermeli A; Erdem MN; Aydogan M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct; 50(5):544-547. PubMed ID: 27776930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical Footprint Anthropometry in Indian Population: Implications on Design of Artificial Disc Replacement Devices.
    Kulkarni AG; Patil VM; Bangalore SK; Saraf A
    Asian Spine J; 2016 Feb; 10(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26949454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sagittal endplate morphology of the lower lumbar spine.
    Lakshmanan P; Purushothaman B; Dvorak V; Schratt W; Thambiraj S; Boszczyk M
    Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S160-4. PubMed ID: 22315035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological studies of cartilage endplates in subaxial cervical region.
    Zhao S; Hao D; Jiang Y; Huang D; Ge C; Feng H
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2218-22. PubMed ID: 26611364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences of the Morphology of Subaxial Cervical Spine Endplates between Chinese and White Men and Women.
    Yao Q; Yin P; Khan K; Tsai TY; Li JS; Hai Y; Tang P; Li G
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2854175. PubMed ID: 29675423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.
    Lim TH; Kwon H; Jeon CH; Kim JG; Sokolowski M; Natarajan R; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):951-6. PubMed ID: 11317120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of Cervical Endplate Size: One Size Does Not Fit All.
    Soo AE; Olsson E; Lim M
    Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3):e526-31. PubMed ID: 27135446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The distribution of mineral density in the cervical vertebral endplates.
    Müller-Gerbl M; Weißer S; Linsenmeier U
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Mar; 17(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 18193299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws?
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 20121359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.