226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28274670)
1. Detection of copy number variations in melanocytic lesions utilising array based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Mesbah Ardakani N; Thomas C; Robinson C; Mina K; Harvey NT; Amanuel B; Wood BA
Pathology; 2017 Apr; 49(3):285-291. PubMed ID: 28274670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A genome-wide high-resolution array-CGH analysis of cutaneous melanoma and comparison of array-CGH to FISH in diagnostic evaluation.
Wang L; Rao M; Fang Y; Hameed M; Viale A; Busam K; Jhanwar SC
J Mol Diagn; 2013 Sep; 15(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 23800576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Copy number variation in archival melanoma biopsies versus benign melanocytic lesions.
Mahas A; Potluri K; Kent MN; Naik S; Markey M
Cancer Biomark; 2016 Mar; 16(4):575-97. PubMed ID: 27002761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular testing of borderline cutaneous melanocytic lesions: SNP array is more sensitive and specific than FISH.
Carter MD; Durham AB; Miedema JR; Harms PW; Chan MP; Patel RM; Lowe L; Fullen DR; Hristov AC; Wang M; Andea AA
Hum Pathol; 2019 Apr; 86():115-123. PubMed ID: 30576704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic tumours by four-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation.
Morey AL; Murali R; McCarthy SW; Mann GJ; Scolyer RA
Pathology; 2009; 41(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 19404853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Copy number variations and clinical outcome in atypical spitz tumors.
Raskin L; Ludgate M; Iyer RK; Ackley TE; Bradford CR; Johnson TM; Fullen DR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 21263245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative cytogenetic characterization of primary canine melanocytic lesions using array CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Poorman K; Borst L; Moroff S; Roy S; Labelle P; Motsinger-Reif A; Breen M
Chromosome Res; 2015 Jun; 23(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 25511566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chromosomal copy number analysis in melanoma diagnostics.
North JP; Vemula SS; Bastian BC
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1102():199-226. PubMed ID: 24258981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing melanocytic nevi from melanoma by DNA copy number changes: comparative genomic hybridization as a research and diagnostic tool.
Bauer J; Bastian BC
Dermatol Ther; 2006; 19(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 16405569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TERT and AURKA gene copy number gains enhance the detection of acral lentiginous melanomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Diaz A; Puig-Butillé JA; Valera A; Muñoz C; Costa D; Garcia-Herrera A; Carrera C; Sole F; Malvehy J; Puig S; Alos L
J Mol Diagn; 2014 Mar; 16(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 24374110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced detection of spitzoid melanomas using fluorescence in situ hybridization with 9p21 as an adjunctive probe.
Gammon B; Beilfuss B; Guitart J; Gerami P
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 21989344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative genomic hybridization shows complex genomic changes of plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma.
Keck B; Ellmann C; Stoehr R; Weigelt K; Goebell PJ; Kunath F; Taubert H; Hartmann A; Wullich B; Wach S
Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1234-9. PubMed ID: 25087089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus.
Micci F; Teixeira MR; Haugom L; Kristensen G; Abeler VM; Heim S
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2004 Jul; 40(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 15139002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A proposal for improving multicolor FISH sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma using new combined criteria.
Kerl K; Palmedo G; Wiesner T; Mentzel T; Rütten A; Schärer L; Paredes B; Hantschke M; Kutzner H
Am J Dermatopathol; 2012 Aug; 34(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 22668575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization detection of copy number changes in desmoplastic melanoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Pryor JG; Brown-Kipphut BA; Iqbal A; Scott GA
Am J Dermatopathol; 2011 Dec; 33(8):780-5. PubMed ID: 21785329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) evaluation of chromosomes 6, 7, 9 and 10 throughout human melanocytic tumorigenesis.
Casorzo L; Luzzi C; Nardacchione A; Picciotto F; Pisacane A; Risio M
Melanoma Res; 2005 Jun; 15(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 15917696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide copy number variations as molecular diagnostic tool for cutaneous intermediate melanocytic lesions: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Ebbelaar CF; Jansen AML; Bloem LT; Blokx WAM
Virchows Arch; 2021 Oct; 479(4):773-783. PubMed ID: 33851238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a diagnostic tool in melanocytic lesions, using paraffin wax-embedded tissues and imprint-cytology specimens.
Abásolo A; Vargas MT; Ríos-Martín JJ; Trigo I; Arjona A; González-Cámpora R
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 37(8):838-43. PubMed ID: 22731835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of malignant melanoma from benign nevus using a novel genomic microarray with low specimen requirements.
Chandler WM; Rowe LR; Florell SR; Jahromi MS; Schiffman JD; South ST
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Aug; 136(8):947-55. PubMed ID: 22849744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome.
Namiki T; Yanagawa S; Izumo T; Ishikawa M; Tachibana M; Kawakami Y; Yokozeki H; Nishioka K; Kaneko Y
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Feb; 157(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15676140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]