These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28274799)

  • 21. Is there an interaction between socioeconomic status and FRAX 10-year fracture probability determined with and without bone density measures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study of female cohort.
    Brennan SL; Quirk SE; Hosking SM; Kotowicz MA; Holloway KL; Moloney DJ; Dobbins AG; Pasco JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2015 Feb; 96(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 25578145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study of the value of trabecular bone score in fracture risk assessment of postmenopausal women.
    Mirzaei A; Jahed SA; Nojomi M; Rajaei A; Zabihiyeganeh M
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 57(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 29880171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review.
    Nayak S; Edwards DL; Saleh AA; Greenspan SL
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):23-49. PubMed ID: 24105431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. FRAX predicts fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients.
    Naylor KL; Leslie WD; Hodsman AB; Rush DN; Garg AX
    Transplantation; 2014 May; 97(9):940-5. PubMed ID: 24503761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Good is Our Best Guess? Clinical Application of the WHO FRAX Tool in Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Determination and Treatment Decisions.
    Hinz L; Freiheit E; Kline G
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Aug; 99(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 27038319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Added clinical use of trabecular bone score to BMD for major osteoporotic fracture prediction in older Chinese people: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.
    Su Y; Leung J; Hans D; Aubry-Rozier B; Kwok T
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):151-160. PubMed ID: 27725999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.
    Rubin KH; Friis-Holmberg T; Hermann AP; Abrahamsen B; Brixen K
    J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1701-17. PubMed ID: 23592255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FRAX prognostic and intervention thresholds in the management of major bone fractures in hemodialysis patients: A two-year prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Przedlacki J; Buczyńska-Chyl J; Koźmiński P; Niemczyk E; Wojtaszek E; Gieglis E; Żebrowski P; Podgórzak A; Wściślak J; Wieliczko M; Grochowski J; Kędzierska M; Kaczanowska B; Wyszyńska A; Sitkowska-Kurzec Z; Klatko W; Gellert R; Daniewska D; Osuch D; Stryjewski D; Świtalski M; Piotrowski A; Stopiński M; Kędzierski P; Rydzewski A; Fiderkiewicz B; Wypych-Birecka M; Śliwicka D; Durlik M; Grzeszczyk M; Sokalski A; Papliński M; Hartman J; Imiela J; Małecki R; Bolesta A; Niemczyk S; Klimm W; Wierzbicki P; Gorczyńska J; Piórecki M; Gołębiewski S; Horbacz R; Małyszko J; Matuszkiewicz-Rowińska J
    Bone; 2020 Apr; 133():115188. PubMed ID: 31843681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Clinical application of FRAX® in Japan].
    Hosoi T
    Clin Calcium; 2012 Jun; 22(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 22653025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluation of osteoporotic fractures in the group of woman over 50 years of age--comparison of tools FRAX BMD versus FRAX BMI].
    Strugala C; Sobala W; Szubert Z; Hanke W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24261246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A combination of clinical balance measures and FRAX® to improve identification of high-risk fallers.
    Najafi DA; Dahlberg LE; Hansson EE
    BMC Geriatr; 2016 May; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27142632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
    Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Marques A; Ferreira RJ; Santos E; Loza E; Carmona L; da Silva JA
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2015 Nov; 74(11):1958-67. PubMed ID: 26248637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
    Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Epidemiology of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fractures in a Dutch Population of Community-Dwelling Elderly: Implications for the Dutch FRAX® Algorithm.
    Klop C; Welsing PM; Leufkens HG; Elders PJ; Overbeek JA; van den Bergh JP; Bijlsma JW; de Vries F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143800. PubMed ID: 26633011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.
    Zerbini CA; Szejnfeld VL; Abergaria BH; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2015; 10():224. PubMed ID: 26303038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between frailty index of deficit accumulation and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in prediction of risk of fractures.
    Li G; Thabane L; Papaioannou A; Adachi JD
    Bone; 2015 Aug; 77():107-14. PubMed ID: 25916552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
    Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
    Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and applicability of the FRAX tool in Joinville City, Southern Brazil.
    Silva DMW; Borba VZC; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):111. PubMed ID: 29224172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.