These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28275358)

  • 1. Cognitive Penetration and Attention.
    Gross S
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():221. PubMed ID: 28275358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-cueing, the Epistemic Role of Early Vision, and the Cognitive Impenetrability of Early Vision.
    Raftopoulos A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1156. PubMed ID: 28740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No Evidence of Narrowly Defined Cognitive Penetrability in Unambiguous Vision.
    Lammers NA; de Haan EH; Pinto Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():852. PubMed ID: 28740471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive penetration of early vision in face perception.
    Cecchi AS
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Aug; 63():254-266. PubMed ID: 29909046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on cognitively driven attention suggest that late vision is cognitively penetrated, whereas early vision is not.
    Raftopoulos A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e256. PubMed ID: 28355840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and cognitive penetrability: The epistemic consequences of attention as a form of metacognitive regulation.
    Marchi F
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():48-62. PubMed ID: 27397922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception.
    Pylyshyn Z
    Behav Brain Sci; 1999 Jun; 22(3):341-65; discussion 366-423. PubMed ID: 11301517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise, uncertainty, and interest: Predictive coding and cognitive penetration.
    Vance J; Stokes D
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():86-98. PubMed ID: 27329550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No matter how: Top-down effects of verbal and semantic category knowledge on early visual perception.
    Maier M; Abdel Rahman R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):859-876. PubMed ID: 30607831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Color Experience Cognitively Penetrable?
    Brogaard B; Gatzia DE
    Top Cogn Sci; 2017 Jan; 9(1):193-214. PubMed ID: 27797145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention alters predictive processing.
    Clark A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e234. PubMed ID: 28355839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention and multisensory modulation argue against total encapsulation.
    de Haas B; Schwarzkopf DS; Rees G
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e237. PubMed ID: 28355848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception.
    Vetter P; Newen A
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():62-75. PubMed ID: 24836978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account.
    Newen A; Vetter P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():26-37. PubMed ID: 27667320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting a grasp on action-specific scaling: A response to Witt (2017).
    Collier ES; Lawson R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):374-384. PubMed ID: 30238293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priors in perception: Top-down modulation, Bayesian perceptual learning rate, and prediction error minimization.
    Hohwy J
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():75-85. PubMed ID: 27663763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.
    Emberson LL
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e240. PubMed ID: 28355843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Firestone & Scholl conflate two distinct issues.
    Ogilvie R; Carruthers P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e255. PubMed ID: 28355837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not even wrong: The "it's just X" fallacy.
    Lupyan G
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e251. PubMed ID: 28355864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional processing and the subjective contour illusion.
    Pritchard WS; Warm JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Jun; 112(2):145-75. PubMed ID: 6223970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.