227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28275775)
1. History of EPI Suite™ and future perspectives on chemical property estimation in US Toxic Substances Control Act new chemical risk assessments.
Card ML; Gomez-Alvarez V; Lee WH; Lynch DG; Orentas NS; Lee MT; Wong EM; Boethling RS
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 28275775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ranking of concern, based on environmental indexes, for pharmaceutical and personal care products: an application to the Spanish case.
Ortiz de García S; Pinto GP; García-Encina PA; Irusta Mata RI
J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():384-97. PubMed ID: 23995140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.
Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP
Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act.
Krimsky S
PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2002404. PubMed ID: 29252997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving substance information in USEtox
Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The new chemicals process at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): structure-activity relationships for hazard identification and risk assessment.
Wagner PM; Nabholz JV; Kent RJ
Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):67-73. PubMed ID: 7570675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population susceptibility: A vital consideration in chemical risk evaluation under the Lautenberg Toxic Substances Control Act.
Koman PD; Singla V; Lam J; Woodruff TJ
PLoS Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(8):e3000372. PubMed ID: 31465433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science and regulation. New science for chemicals policy.
Schwarzman MR; Wilson MP
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5956):1065-6. PubMed ID: 19965413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. (Q)SARs to predict environmental toxicities: current status and future needs.
Cronin MT
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 28243641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mixture toxicity, cumulative risk, and environmental justice in United States federal policy, 1980-2016 : Why, with much known, was little done?
Sprinkle RH; Payne-Sturges DC
Environ Health; 2021 Sep; 20(1):104. PubMed ID: 34535123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rethink how chemical hazards are tested.
Warner JC; Ludwig JK
Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):269-70. PubMed ID: 27535519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of dermal exposure assessment in the US Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Substances Control Act risk evaluations of chemical manufacturing.
Lynch HN; Gloekler LE; Allen LH; Maskrey JR; Bevan C; Maier A
Toxicol Ind Health; 2023 Jan; 39(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 36420912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of existing chemicals under TSCA: information disclosure as the route to reducing risk and increasing available data.
Rosenthal I; Weiler ED; Keener RL; Cumberland PJ
Qual Assur; 1992 Feb; 1(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 1344214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
Vogel SA; Roberts JA
Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Property Estimation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: A Comparative Assessment of Estimation Methods.
Lampic A; Parnis JM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Apr; 39(4):775-786. PubMed ID: 32022323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human health and the environment can't wait for reform: current opportunities for the federal government and states to address chemical risks under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Trevisan L
Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):385-430. PubMed ID: 25335197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Updating the Toxic Substances Control Act to Protect Human Health.
Trasande L
JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(15):1565-6. PubMed ID: 26974705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals.
Gramatica P; Papa E; Sangion A
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 29226926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
