These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28275934)

  • 1. Organizing a Collaborative Development of Technological Design Requirements Using a Constructive Dialogue on Value Profiles: A Case in Automated Vehicle Development.
    Flipse SM; Puylaert S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 28275934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engineers and Active Responsibility.
    Pesch U
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):925-39. PubMed ID: 25005341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Broader impacts" or "responsible research and innovation"? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering.
    Davis M; Laas K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Dec; 20(4):963-83. PubMed ID: 24155159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.
    Schuurbiers D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):769-88. PubMed ID: 22057782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.
    Borenstein J; Herkert JR; Miller KW
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):383-398. PubMed ID: 29134429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.
    Reijers W; Wright D; Brey P; Weber K; Rodrigues R; O'Sullivan D; Gordijn B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1437-1481. PubMed ID: 28900898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences.
    Flipse SM; van der Sanden MC; Osseweijer P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Mar; 20(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 23467918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.
    Flipse SM; van der Sanden MC; Osseweijer P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Sep; 19(3):703-25. PubMed ID: 23224703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design.
    Manders-Huits N
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Jun; 17(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20224927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Ethics of Technology: Response to Critics.
    Peterson M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1645-1652. PubMed ID: 30143956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stakeholder Views of Nanosilver Linings: Macroethics Education and Automated Text Analysis Through Participatory Governance Role Play in a Workshop Format.
    Dempsey J; Stamets J; Eggleson K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Jun; 23(3):913-939. PubMed ID: 27405936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".
    Wynne B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 22015948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses.
    Legault GA; Verchère C; Patenaude J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):529-549. PubMed ID: 28397176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When technologies makes good people do bad things: another argument against the value-neutrality of technologies.
    Morrow DR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 23975174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Strength of Ethical Matrixes as a Tool for Normative Analysis Related to Technological Choices: The Case of Geological Disposal for Radioactive Waste.
    Kermisch C; Depaus C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 28281155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Holding the Project Accountable: Research Governance, Ethics, and Democracy.
    Leese M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1597-1616. PubMed ID: 28058620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach.
    Cummings ML
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2006 Oct; 12(4):701-15. PubMed ID: 17199145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Broader impacts" or "responsible research and innovation"?
    Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Dec; 20(4):1149-50. PubMed ID: 24318485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.
    Shelley-Egan C; Bowman DM; Robinson DKR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1719-1746. PubMed ID: 29019058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Values in University-Industry Collaborations: The Case of Academics Working at Universities of Technology.
    Hillerbrand R; Werker C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1633-1656. PubMed ID: 31620956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.