These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28275948)

  • 1. The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.
    Bugg JM; Ball BH
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):755-775. PubMed ID: 28275948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.
    Ball BH; Bugg JM
    Psychol Aging; 2018 May; 33(3):527-544. PubMed ID: 29756806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A fresh pair of eyes on prospective memory monitoring.
    Shelton JT; Christopher EA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 26968711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Ball BH; Li YP; Bugg JM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):370-389. PubMed ID: 31628616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.
    Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ERP correlates of target checking are dependent upon the defining features of the prospective memory cues.
    Scolaro A; West R; Cohen AL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 24952215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues.
    Kunar MA; John R; Sweetman H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1366-82. PubMed ID: 24199842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: high spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.
    Davis GJ; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1192-201. PubMed ID: 22390290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing.
    Bowden VK; Smith RE; Loft S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):692-711. PubMed ID: 33420709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.
    Herron JE; Evans LH; Wilding EL
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():24-31. PubMed ID: 26892854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Executive working memory involved in the learning of contextual cueing effect.
    Chen M; Wang C; Sclodnick B; Zhao G; Liu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):3059-3070. PubMed ID: 31538226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mixture distribution of spatial attention.
    Feng J; Spence I
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23128583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configural learning in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Vadillo MA; Pearson D; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1173-85. PubMed ID: 26913779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.