These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28275948)

  • 21. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. After-effects without monitoring costs: The impact of prospective memory instructions on task switching performance.
    Meier B; Rey-Mermet A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():85-99. PubMed ID: 28477841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):112-128. PubMed ID: 34184211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development of prospective memory in young schoolchildren: the impact of ongoing task absorption, cue salience, and cue centrality.
    Kliegel M; Mahy CE; Voigt B; Henry JD; Rendell PG; Aberle I
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):792-810. PubMed ID: 24056203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal and peripheral extraction of contextual cues from scenes during visual search.
    Koehler K; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2017 Feb; 17(2):16. PubMed ID: 28245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations.
    Zellin M; Conci M; von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2065-76. PubMed ID: 21755420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment.
    Mack SC; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.
    Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response dynamics in prospective memory.
    Abney DH; McBride DM; Conte AM; Vinson DW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1020-8. PubMed ID: 25407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Least Costs Hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to the voluntary symbolic control of attention.
    Pauszek JR; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1199-1215. PubMed ID: 29708384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does predictability matter? Effects of cue predictability on neurocognitive mechanisms underlying prospective memory.
    Cona G; Arcara G; Tarantino V; Bisiacchi PS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():188. PubMed ID: 25918503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cognitive cost of event-based prospective memory in children.
    Leigh J; Marcovitch S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():24-35. PubMed ID: 24853249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prospective memory in multiple sclerosis: The impact of cue distinctiveness and executive functioning.
    Dagenais E; Rouleau I; Tremblay A; Demers M; Roger É; Jobin C; Duquette P
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Nov; 109():66-74. PubMed ID: 27643953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Pitães M; Brewer GA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 29415613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs.
    Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Moscovitch M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2630-46. PubMed ID: 23645716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.