These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28276084)

  • 1. Estimating marginal causal effects in a secondary analysis of case-control data.
    Persson E; Waernbaum I; Lind T
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2404-2419. PubMed ID: 28276084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating a marginal causal odds ratio in a case-control design: analyzing the effect of low birth weight on the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Persson E; Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(14):2500-12. PubMed ID: 23606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 22462152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient analysis of case-control studies with sample weights.
    Landsman V; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 22833421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical inferences for data from studies conducted with an aggregated multivariate outcome-dependent sample design.
    Lu TS; Longnecker MP; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):985-997. PubMed ID: 27966260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double robust estimator of average causal treatment effect for censored medical cost data.
    Wang X; Beste LA; Maier MM; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(18):3101-16. PubMed ID: 26818601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubly robust estimation of the weighted average treatment effect for a target population.
    Tao Y; Fu H
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 30302780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted estimation for confounded binary outcomes subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 29082530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regression analysis of mixed panel count data with dependent terminal events.
    Yu G; Zhu L; Li Y; Sun J; Robison LL
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1669-1680. PubMed ID: 28098397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of case-cohort designs with binary outcomes: Improving efficiency using whole-cohort auxiliary information.
    Noma H; Tanaka S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):691-706. PubMed ID: 25348675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conditional bias-adjusted estimators for interim analysis in clinical trials with survival data.
    Shimura M; Gosho M; Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2067-2080. PubMed ID: 28211076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.
    Kim S; Huang Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2347-2362. PubMed ID: 28276080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating time-dependent ROC curves using data under prevalent sampling.
    Li S
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1285-1301. PubMed ID: 27891650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of longitudinal marginal structural models.
    Bryan J; Yu Z; Van Der Laan MJ
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jul; 5(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 15208200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding the power to reduce publication bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JP
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1580-1598. PubMed ID: 28127782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.