These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28276146)

  • 61. [A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].
    Liu R; Zhao GD; Tang WB; Zhang KD; Zhao ZM; Gao YX; Hu MG; Li CG; Tan XL; Zhang X
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Feb; 38(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 29502049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Mitigation of the Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Learning Curve through comprehensive training.
    Ryoo DY; Eskander MF; Hamad A; Li Y; Cloyd J; Manilchuk A; Tsung A; Pawlik TM; Dillhoff M; Schmidt C; Ejaz A
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 Oct; 23(10):1550-1556. PubMed ID: 33903049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Lessons Learned from the Introduction of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Nieuwenhuijs VB; de Klein GW; van Duijvendijk P; Patijn GA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 May; 30(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 31971863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve.
    Parisi A; Scrucca L; Desiderio J; Gemini A; Guarino S; Ricci F; Cirocchi R; Palazzini G; D'Andrea V; Minelli L; Trastulli S
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28317582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Assessment of learning curve and oncologic feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score-based comparison with open approach.
    Kim H; Park SY; Park Y; Kwon J; Lee W; Song KB; Hwang DW; Kim SC; Lee JH
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Jun; 29(6):649-658. PubMed ID: 33058484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Learning Curve in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Palmeri M; Miccoli M; Costa F; Vistoli F; Amorese G; Boggi U
    Dig Surg; 2016; 33(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 27215422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience.
    Guerrieri M; Campagnacci R; Sperti P; Belfiori G; Gesuita R; Ghiselli R
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(46):13152-9. PubMed ID: 26674518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience.
    Kendrick ML; Cusati D
    Arch Surg; 2010 Jan; 145(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 20083750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Laparoscopic, hybrid, and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    Ayloo S; Roh Y; Choudhury N
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 26809754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study.
    Sawada H; Egi H; Hattori M; Suzuki T; Shimomura M; Tanabe K; Okajima M; Ohdan H
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():103. PubMed ID: 25885046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Operative Steps (With Video).
    Memeo R; Tzedakis S; de Blasi V; Dehlawi A; Untereiner X; Rodriguez M; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Pessaux P
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Oct; 26(5):e91-e94. PubMed ID: 27636149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Learning Curve From 450 Cases of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduocectomy in a High-Volume Pancreatic Center: Optimization of Operative Procedure and a Retrospective Study.
    Shi Y; Wang W; Qiu W; Zhao S; Wang J; Weng Y; Huo Z; Jin J; Wang Y; Deng X; Shen B; Peng C
    Ann Surg; 2021 Dec; 274(6):e1277-e1283. PubMed ID: 31651533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Minimally Invasive Surgical Site Infection in Procedure-Targeted ACS NSQIP Pancreaticoduodenectomies.
    McCracken EKE; Mureebe L; Blazer DG
    J Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 233():183-191. PubMed ID: 30502246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?
    Aziz H; Khan M; Khan S; Serra GP; Goodman MD; Genyk Y; Sheikh MR
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 34398365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Qin K; Wu Z; Jin J; Shen B; Peng C
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Apr; 24():2287-2293. PubMed ID: 29658495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP.
    Benlice C; Aytac E; Costedio M; Kessler H; Abbas MA; Remzi FH; Gorgun E
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 27766727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Horiguchi A; Uyama I; Miyakawa S
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2011 Mar; 18(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 20811915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.