These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28277532)
1. Science journalism can be evidence-based, compelling - and wrong. Nature; 2017 Mar; 543(7644):150. PubMed ID: 28277532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predatory journals and their effects on scientific research community. Habibzadeh F; Simundic AM Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):270-272. PubMed ID: 28694717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The press under pressure. Nature; 2011 Dec; 480(7376):151. PubMed ID: 22158203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The blogification of science. Carney KK J Calif Dent Assoc; 2013 Sep; 41(9):653-4. PubMed ID: 24279071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who am I? It shouldn't really matter. Caveman J Cell Sci; 1999 Sep; 112 ( Pt 17)():2811. PubMed ID: 10617382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Too much, too soon. Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7042):538. PubMed ID: 15931177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts. Slade E; Tamber PS Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Press before paper--when media and science collide. Stewart CN Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 12665812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The changing uses of accuracy in science communication. Hansen A Public Underst Sci; 2016 Oct; 25(7):760-774. PubMed ID: 26960909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergence of "pseudoscience". Healey MA Can Fam Physician; 1998 Nov; 44():2374-5. PubMed ID: 9839046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Spinning out of control. Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7018):657. PubMed ID: 15592364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Society needs more than wonder to respect science. Watts S Nature; 2014 Apr; 508(7495):151. PubMed ID: 24717473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: Trial by Twitter. Mandavilli A Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):286-7. PubMed ID: 21248816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science journals artfully try to boost their rankings. Begley S Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Jun; ():B1, B8. PubMed ID: 16838450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. World view: Calling science to account. Macilwain C Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7283):875. PubMed ID: 20164898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cloning agenda 'skewed' by media frenzy. Check E Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):722. PubMed ID: 11845169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining criteria for good environmental journalism and testing their applicability: An environmental news review as a first step to more evidence based environmental science reporting. Rögener W; Wormer H Public Underst Sci; 2017 May; 26(4):418-433. PubMed ID: 26265708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science journalists' perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain. Cortiñas-Rovira S; Alonso-Marcos F; Pont-Sorribes C; Escribà-Sales E Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 25471350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]