BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28277725)

  • 1. Why do employees have better family lives when they are highly engaged at work?
    Ilies R; Liu XY; Liu Y; Zheng X
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jun; 102(6):956-970. PubMed ID: 28277725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family.
    Halbesleben JR; Harvey J; Bolino MC
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Nov; 94(6):1452-65. PubMed ID: 19916655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The virtuous cycle of daily motivation: Effects of daily strivings on work behaviors, need satisfaction, and next-day strivings.
    Foulk TA; Lanaj K; Krishnan S
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jun; 104(6):755-775. PubMed ID: 30640494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-family conflict and social behaviors at home.
    Ilies R; Schwind KM; Wagner DT; Johnson MD; DeRue DS; Ilgen DR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1368-79. PubMed ID: 17845091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator.
    Kim S; Park Y; Headrick L
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jul; 103(7):772-786. PubMed ID: 29595289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capitalization on positive family events and task performance: A perspective from the work-home resources model.
    Du D; Bakker AB; Derks D
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2020 Oct; 25(5):357-367. PubMed ID: 32718151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why does using personal strengths at work increase employee engagement, who makes the most out of it, and how?
    Ilies R; Liu Y; Aw S; Las Heras M; Rofcanin Y
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2024 Apr; 29(2):113-129. PubMed ID: 38647463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Work-to-Family Enrichment and Conflict Profiles: Job Characteristics and Employees' Well-Being.
    Carvalho VS; Chambel MJ
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 19():E65. PubMed ID: 27692011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Help or hindrance? Day-level relationships between flextime use, work-nonwork boundaries, and affective well-being.
    Spieler I; Scheibe S; Stamov-Roßnagel C; Kappas A
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jan; 102(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 27618411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Workaholic and work engaged employees: dead ringers or worlds apart?
    van Beek I; Taris TW; Schaufeli WB
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2011 Oct; 16(4):468-82. PubMed ID: 21787085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Daily Beneficial Effects of Work-to-Family Facilitation on Employees' Recovery and General Health: Is More Work Engagement Always Better?
    Carmona-Cobo I; Blanco-Donoso LM; Garrosa E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():661267. PubMed ID: 34335371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment.
    Venkataramani V; Labianca GJ; Grosser T
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Nov; 98(6):1028-39. PubMed ID: 23915428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of work-family interface on domain-specific satisfaction and well-being across nations: The moderating effects of individualistic culture and economic development.
    Xu S; Wang Y; Mu R; Jin J; Gao F
    Psych J; 2018 Dec; 7(4):248-267. PubMed ID: 30113133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meaningfulness misfit: Consequences of daily meaningful work needs-supplies incongruence for daily engagement.
    Vogel RM; Rodell JB; Sabey TB
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Jul; 105(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 31697115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personal costs and benefits of employee intrapreneurship: Disentangling the employee intrapreneurship, well-being, and job performance relationship.
    Gawke JC; Gorgievski MJ; Bakker AB
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23(4):508-519. PubMed ID: 29283602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees' motivational states and behavior at work.
    Gerpott FH; Rivkin W; Unger D
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Feb; 107(2):169-192. PubMed ID: 33829832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of partners and children for employees' psychological detachment from work and well-being.
    Hahn VC; Dormann C
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23106684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spillover of interpersonal conflicts from work into nonwork: A daily diary study.
    Martinez-Corts I; Demerouti E; Bakker AB; Boz M
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2015 Jul; 20(3):326-337. PubMed ID: 25602278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance.
    Van Wingerden J; Van der Stoep J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197599. PubMed ID: 29897935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ripple Effects of Surface Acting: A Diary Study among Dual-Earner Couples.
    Bakker AB; Sanz-Vergel AI; Rodríguez-Muñoz A; Antino M
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Mar; 22():E7. PubMed ID: 30819266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.