These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28278038)

  • 1. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision-making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India.
    Chauhan A; Singh A; Jharkharia S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Feb; 68(2):100-110. PubMed ID: 28278038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approaches to formalization of the informal waste sector into municipal solid waste management systems in low- and middle-income countries: Review of barriers and success factors.
    Aparcana S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():593-607. PubMed ID: 28038906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of barriers in e-waste management in developing economy: an integrated multiple-criteria decision-making approach.
    Jangre J; Prasad K; Patel D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(48):72294-72308. PubMed ID: 35696062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the restrictive factors for the development of the construction waste recycling industry in a second-tier Chinese city: a case study from Jinan.
    Wei Y; Zhang L; Sang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46394-46413. PubMed ID: 36719585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical factors for implementing collection target responsibility in e-waste collection in China: A DEMATEL-ISM analysis.
    Yin H; Qu Y; Guo L
    Waste Manag; 2023 Dec; 172():278-289. PubMed ID: 37931547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of critical factors in construction and demolition waste recycling by the grey-DEMATEL approach: a Chinese perspective.
    Liu H; Long H; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):8507-8525. PubMed ID: 31907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards the circular economy: Analysis of barriers to implementation of Turkey's zero waste management using the fuzzy DEMATEL method.
    Ayçin E; Kayapinar Kaya S
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Aug; 39(8):1078-1089. PubMed ID: 33588709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Between hype and veracity; privatization of municipal solid waste management and its impacts on the informal waste sector.
    Sandhu K; Burton P; Dedekorkut-Howes A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():545-556. PubMed ID: 27769651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analytical framework and tool ('InteRa') for integrating the informal recycling sector in waste and resource management systems in developing countries.
    Velis CA; Wilson DC; Rocca O; Smith SR; Mavropoulos A; Cheeseman CR
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):43-66. PubMed ID: 22993135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barriers to compulsory waste sorting for a circular economy in China.
    Zhang A; Xie S; Gong Y; Li C; Liu Y
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Sep; 342():118180. PubMed ID: 37207459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty.
    Wibowo S; Deng H
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():127-35. PubMed ID: 25804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste.
    Srour IM; Chehab GR; El-Fadel M; Tamraz S
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1170-9. PubMed ID: 23460542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes.
    Ongondo FO; Williams ID; Cherrett TJ
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):714-30. PubMed ID: 21146974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informal electronic waste recycling: a sector review with special focus on China.
    Chi X; Streicher-Porte M; Wang MY; Reuter MA
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):731-42. PubMed ID: 21147524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Healthcare waste management: an interpretive structural modeling approach.
    Thakur V; Anbanandam R
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2016 Jun; 29(5):559-81. PubMed ID: 27256778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caught between the global economy and local bureaucracy: the barriers to good waste management practice in South Africa.
    Godfrey L; Scott D; Trois C
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 23377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting embodied economic potential of healthcare waste recycling-a case study from Pakistan.
    Ali M; Geng Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Oct; 190(11):678. PubMed ID: 30368602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fuzzy AHP approach for prioritizing electronic waste management options: a case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Khoshand A; Rahimi K; Ehteshami M; Gharaei S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):9649-9660. PubMed ID: 30729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of efficiency of waste reverse logistics for recycling.
    Veiga MM
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10 Suppl):26-34. PubMed ID: 23997069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expanding worldwide urban solid waste recycling: The Brazilian social technology in waste pickers inclusion.
    Rutkowski JE; Rutkowski EW
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1084-93. PubMed ID: 26467319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.