BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28278214)

  • 1. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
    Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is purity a distinct and homogeneous domain in moral psychology?
    Kollareth D; Brownell H; DurĂ¡n JI; Russell JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):211-235. PubMed ID: 35901410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
    Gray K
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):329-31. PubMed ID: 25023146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.
    Gray K; DiMaggio N; Schein C; Kachanoff F
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2023 Aug; 27(3):272-308. PubMed ID: 36314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond Purity.
    Giner-Sorolla R; Chapman HA
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 28078976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Illuminating the conceptual structure of the space of moral violations with searchlight representational similarity analysis.
    Wasserman EA; Chakroff A; Saxe R; Young L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():371-387. PubMed ID: 28743459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
    Ward SJ; King LA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):825-849. PubMed ID: 28627916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.