These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28279083)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants.
    Solberg K; Heinemann F; Pellikaan P; Keilig L; Stark H; Bourauel C; Hasan I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):770-782. PubMed ID: 28279083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures in Complete Cleft Palate Models: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Soğancı G; Yazıcıoğlu H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 24919124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical investigation of complete mandibular dentures stabilized by conventional or mini implants in patient individual models.
    Lohmann A; Keilig L; Heinemann F; Bourauel C; Hasan I
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Feb; 64(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29420301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
    Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Number and Location of Mini-Implants Retaining a Mandibular Overdenture to Resist Lateral Forces: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.
    Takagaki K; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):248–250. PubMed ID: 28319215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Topkaya T; Solmaz MY
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2102-9. PubMed ID: 25862522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.
    Hasan I; Madarlis C; Keilig L; Dirk C; Weber A; Bourauel C; Heinemann F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():116-122. PubMed ID: 27496252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical Study of Optimal Implant Position for Maxillary Implant-Supported Overdentures Using Three-Dimensional Simulation Software.
    Kamei K; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):619–626. PubMed ID: 30192350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.