These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28279289)

  • 1. Changes in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Deemed "Inappropriate" by Appropriate Use Criteria.
    Hannan EL; Samadashvili Z; Cozzens K; Gesten F; Osinaga A; Fish DG; Donahue CL; Bass RJ; Walford G; Jacobs AK; Venditti FJ; Stamato NJ; Berger PB; Sharma S; King SB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Mar; 69(10):1234-1242. PubMed ID: 28279289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015.
    Hess PL; Kini V; Liu W; Roldan P; Autruong P; Grunwald GK; O'Donnell C; Doll JA; Ho PM; Bradley SM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203144. PubMed ID: 32315067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness: Insights From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program.
    Bradley SM; Bohn CM; Malenka DJ; Graham MM; Bryson CL; McCabe JM; Curtis JP; Lambert-Kerzner A; Maynard C
    Circulation; 2015 Jul; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26022910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Desai NR; Bradley SM; Parzynski CS; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Ader J; Soufer A; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP
    JAMA; 2015 Nov; 314(19):2045-53. PubMed ID: 26551163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of a real-time appropriate use criteria decision support application for percutaneous coronary interventions in non-acute coronary syndrome.
    Chen SH; Ho KK; Gannon SA; Thyagarajan B; Chakrabarti AK; Potter BJ; Singla A; Piccirillo BJ; Meduri CU; Cutlip DE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):E74-9. PubMed ID: 26699241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appropriateness of elective percutaneous coronary intervention and impact of government health insurance scheme - A tertiary centre experience from Western India.
    Patil D; Lanjewar C; Vaggar G; Bhargava J; Sabnis G; Pahwa J; Phatarpekar A; Shah H; Kerkar P
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(5):600-606. PubMed ID: 29054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2017 Versus 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Impact on Appropriateness Ratings.
    Hannan EL; Samadashvili Z; Cozzens K; Berger PB; Chikwe J; Jacobs AK; Walford G; Ling FSK; Venditti FJ; Gold J; King SB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(5):473-478. PubMed ID: 29519380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chang Z; Han Y; Tang S; Zhao Y; Fu J; Liu Y; Fan Z
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 36975857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in Coded Indications for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Medicare and the Veterans Affairs After Implementation of Hospital-Level Reporting of Appropriate Use Criteria.
    Dayoub EJ; Nathan AS; Khatana SAM; Wadhera RK; Kolansky DM; Yeh RW; Giri J; Groeneveld PW
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 14(4):e006887. PubMed ID: 33719490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients without acute coronary syndromes.
    Hannan EL; Cozzens K; Samadashvili Z; Walford G; Jacobs AK; Holmes DR; Stamato NJ; Sharma S; Venditti FJ; Fergus I; King SB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1870-6. PubMed ID: 22595405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Percutaneous coronary interventions : Use between 2004 and 2012 in Germany].
    Ohlmeier C; Czwikla J; Enders D; Mikolajczyk R; Blindt R; Horenkamp-Sonntag D; Linder R; Garbe E
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2016 Jun; 59(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 27188620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing.
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Ishikawa S; Ohki T; Nishi Y; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Higashi T; Fukuda K
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 7(9):1000-9. PubMed ID: 25234672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-World Use and Appropriateness of Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry).
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Numasawa Y; Suzuki M; Noma S; Nishi Y; Fukuda K
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 116(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 26183792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriateness-based reimbursement of elective invasive coronary procedures in low- and middle-income countries: Preliminary assessment of feasibility in India.
    Karthikeyan G; Shirodkar U; Lochan MR; Birch S
    Natl Med J India; 2017; 30(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 28731000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease in the United States (2007 to 2011).
    Kim LK; Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Minutello RM; Chanin J; Yang DC; Lee MK; Charitakis K; Shah A; Kaple RK; Bergman G; Singh H; Wong SC
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 114(7):1003-10. PubMed ID: 25118124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Coronary Arteries Versus Bypass Grafts in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.
    Brilakis ES; O'Donnell CI; Penny W; Armstrong EJ; Tsai T; Maddox TM; Plomondon ME; Banerjee S; Rao SV; Garcia S; Nallamothu B; Shunk KA; Mavromatis K; Grunwald GK; Bhatt DL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):884-93. PubMed ID: 27085582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions in Washington State.
    Bradley SM; Maynard C; Bryson CL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 22570356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Wennberg DE; Lucas FL; Siewers AE; Kellett MA; Malenka DJ
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(16):1961-8. PubMed ID: 15507581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in coronary revascularization procedures among Medicare beneficiaries between 2008 and 2012.
    Culler SD; Kugelmass AD; Brown PP; Reynolds MR; Simon AW
    Circulation; 2015 Jan; 131(4):362-70; discussion 370. PubMed ID: 25533970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient and hospital characteristics associated with inappropriate percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Chan PS; Rao SV; Bhatt DL; Rumsfeld JS; Gurm HS; Nallamothu BK; Cavender MA; Kennedy KF; Spertus JA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2274-81. PubMed ID: 24055743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.