These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28279541)

  • 1. Use of a Respondent-Generated Personal Code for Matching Anonymous Adolescent Surveys in Longitudinal Studies.
    Ripper L; Ciaravino S; Jones K; Jaime MCD; Miller E
    J Adolesc Health; 2017 Jun; 60(6):751-753. PubMed ID: 28279541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Security Questions to Link Participants in Longitudinal Data Collection.
    Xu S; Chan A; Lorber MF; Chase JP
    Prev Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 31865542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using self-generated identification codes to match questionnaires in panel studies of adolescent substance use.
    Grube JW; Morgan M; Kearney KA
    Addict Behav; 1989; 14(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 2786325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of a self-generated identification code.
    DiIorio C; Soet JE; Van Marter D; Woodring TM; Dudley WN
    Res Nurs Health; 2000 Apr; 23(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 10782875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When you can't ask their names: linking anonymous respondents with the Hogben number.
    Honig F
    Aust J Public Health; 1995 Feb; 19(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 7734604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matched and Fully Private? A New Self-Generated Identification Code for School-Based Cohort Studies to Increase Perceived Anonymity.
    Calatrava M; de Irala J; Osorio A; Benítez E; Lopez-Del Burgo C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 82(3):465-481. PubMed ID: 35444340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing anonymous link procedures for follow-up of adolescents in a school-based trial: the EU-DAP pilot study.
    Galanti MR; Siliquini R; Cuomo L; Melero JC; Panella M; Faggiano F;
    Prev Med; 2007 Feb; 44(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 16979751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting Student Anonymity in Research Using a Subject-Generated Identification Code.
    Lippe M; Johnson B; Carter P
    J Prof Nurs; 2019; 35(2):120-123. PubMed ID: 30902403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching anonymous participants in longitudinal research on sensitive topics: Challenges and recommendations.
    Palmer JE; Winter SC; McMahon S
    Eval Program Plann; 2020 Feb; 80():101794. PubMed ID: 32109784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Matching anonymous pre-posttests using subject-generated information.
    McGloin J; Holcomb S; Main DS
    Eval Rev; 1996 Dec; 20(6):724-36. PubMed ID: 10183265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A privacy challenge to longitudinal study methods: patient-derived codes.
    Clay FJ; Ozanne-Smith J; Watson W; Congiu M; Fox B
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2006 Aug; 30(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 16956165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving response rates: introducing an anonymous longitudinal survey research protocol for veterinary medical students.
    Reisbig AM; Hafen M; White MB; Rush BR
    J Vet Med Educ; 2007; 34(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 17446648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Anonymity and Utility of De-Identified Clinical Data Based on Japanese Anonymization Criteria.
    Kimura E; Hasegawa S; Chida K; Gamo S; Irino S; Ishida H; Kurihara Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1303. PubMed ID: 29295386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized study of the effect of anonymity, quasi-anonymity, and Certificates of Confidentiality on postpartum women's disclosure of sensitive information.
    Beatty JR; Chase SK; Ondersma SJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2014 Jan; 134():280-284. PubMed ID: 24246900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing and Validating a Novel Anonymous Method for Matching Longitudinal School-Based Data.
    Agley J; Tidd D; Jun M; Eldridge L; Xiao Y; Sussman S; Jayawardene W; Agley D; Gassman R; Dickinson SL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Feb; 81(1):90-109. PubMed ID: 33456063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of anonymity on psychiatric patients' ratings of satisfaction with the initial evaluation.
    Zimmerman M; Holst CG; Mehring LB; Moon S; Berges A
    Ann Clin Psychiatry; 2017 Nov; 29(4):220-226. PubMed ID: 29069106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of sexual abstinence behaviour in Taiwanese adolescents: a longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model.
    Wang RH; Cheng CP; Chou FH
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1010-7. PubMed ID: 19077025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of self-generated identification codes in longitudinal research.
    Yurek LA; Vasey J; Sullivan Havens D
    Eval Rev; 2008 Oct; 32(5):435-52. PubMed ID: 18477737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of a high school condom availability program on sexual attitudes and behaviors.
    Schuster MA; Bell RM; Berry SH; Kanouse DE
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(2):67-72, 88. PubMed ID: 9561871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Successful Strategy for Linking Anonymous Data from Students' and Parents' Questionnaires Using Self-Generated Identification Codes.
    Vacek J; Vonkova H; Gabrhelík R
    Prev Sci; 2017 May; 18(4):450-458. PubMed ID: 28337692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.