408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28279782)
1. A prospective study investigating the impact of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naïve patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: The PROKOMB study.
Baur ADJ; Henkel T; Johannsen M; Speck T; Weißbach L; Hamm B; König F
Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 May; 56():46-51. PubMed ID: 28279782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can 3-Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI avoid unnecessary repeat prostate biopsy in patients with PSA < 10 ng/mL?
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2015 Feb; 13(1):e27-30. PubMed ID: 25081324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Fütterer JJ; Briganti A; De Visschere P; Emberton M; Giannarini G; Kirkham A; Taneja SS; Thoeny H; Villeirs G; Villers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Dec; 68(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 25656808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additional value of magnetic resonance-targeted biopsies to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
von Below C; Wassberg C; Norberg M; Tolf A; Kullberg J; Ladjevardi S; Häggman M; Bill Axelson A; Ahlström H
Scand J Urol; 2017 Apr; 51(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 28635568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].
Kesch C; Radtke JP; Distler F; Boxler S; Klein T; Hüttenbrink C; Hees K; Roth W; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Urologe A; 2016 Aug; 55(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27168038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
