352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28281156)
1. Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.
Pickett JT; Roche SP
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):151-171. PubMed ID: 28281156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Science ethics education part I. Perception and attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers.
Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
J BUON; 2011; 16(4):771-7. PubMed ID: 22331736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scientific fraud].
Huppertz HI
Z Rheumatol; 2016 Sep; 75(7):654-7. PubMed ID: 27312467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research].
Barde F; Peiffer-Smadja N; de La Blanchardière A
Rev Med Interne; 2020 May; 41(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 32107052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fraud in biomedical literature].
Vucković-Dekić L
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2006 May; 134 Suppl 1():50-6. PubMed ID: 16796165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.
Pellegrini PA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 28653168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research.
Jacobsen G; Hals A
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 8847683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Revoking the licenses of dishonest academics.
Holder AR
IRB; 1990; 12(2):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Difference in scientists' discourse about scientific fraud and impropriety.
John ID
Aust Psychol; 1991 Jul; 26(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 16134264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science friction.
Gladwell M
Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On being an authentic scientist.
Smith ML
IRB; 1992; 14(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
Schmaus W
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.
Holm S; Hofmann B
Account Res; 2018; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 29874932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
