297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28281788)
1. Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Baek SH; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value?
Daniel OK; Lim SM; Kim JH; Park HS; Park S; Kim SI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):437-444. PubMed ID: 28439735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DCIS of the breast: The value of preoperative MRI.
Doyle AJ; Prakash S; Wang K; Cranshaw I; Taylor E; Oldfield R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26810138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography.
Shiraishi A; Kurosaki Y; Maehara T; Suzuki M; Kurosumi M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Dec; 2(4):159-63. PubMed ID: 16222109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.
Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30322671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Mammography in the Preoperative Detection and Measurement of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Analysis.
Preibsch H; Beckmann J; Pawlowski J; Kloth C; Hahn M; Staebler A; Wietek BM; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):760-765. PubMed ID: 30149976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements using mammography and ultrasonography underestimate the size of high-volume ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liu RQ; Que J; Chen L; Dingee CK; Warburton R; McKevitt EC; Kuusk U; Pao JS; Bazzarelli A
Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 33810833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Ductal Carcinoma
Eichler C; Abrar S; Puppe J; Arndt M; Ohlinger R; Hahn M; Warm M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5065-5070. PubMed ID: 28870935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Zanón G; Fernández PL
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 17964786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Proulx F; Correa JA; Ferré R; Omeroglu A; Aldis A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150543. PubMed ID: 26568438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status.
Chou SS; Gombos EC; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS; Jayender J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1748-1759. PubMed ID: 28371110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
