295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28281884)
1. Enhanced removal of NAPL constituent from aquifer during surfactant flushing with aqueous hydraulic barriers of high viscosity.
Ahn D; Choi JK; Kim H
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jun; 52(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 28281884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporary hydraulic barriers using organic gel for enhanced aquifer remediation during groundwater flushing: Bench-scale experiments.
Oh MS; Annable MD; Kim H
J Contam Hydrol; 2023 Apr; 255():104143. PubMed ID: 36773413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced removal of VOCs from aquifers during air sparging using thickeners and surfactants: Bench-scale experiments.
Kim H; Ahn D; Annable MD
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Jan; 184():25-34. PubMed ID: 26697745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of increased groundwater viscosity on the remedial performance of surfactant-enhanced air sparging.
Choi JK; Kim H; Kwon H; Annable MD
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Mar; 210():42-49. PubMed ID: 29502850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In situ stabilization of NAPL contaminant source-zones as a remediation technique to reduce mass discharge and flux to groundwater.
Mateas DJ; Tick GR; Carroll KC
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():40-56. PubMed ID: 28780996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced mass removal and flux reduction in 3D correlated permeability fields using magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang C; Werth CJ; Webb AG
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):116-26. PubMed ID: 18676059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in air flow patterns using surfactants and thickeners during air sparging: bench-scale experiments.
Kim J; Kim H; Annable MD
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():1-9. PubMed ID: 25462638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerical modelling of the impact of surfactant partitioning on surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation.
Babaei M; Copty NK
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():69-81. PubMed ID: 30691860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissolution and remobilization of NAPL in surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation from microscopic scale simulations.
Ramezanzadeh M; Aminnaji M; Rezanezhad F; Ghazanfari MH; Babaei M
Chemosphere; 2022 Feb; 289():133177. PubMed ID: 34890610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulated formation and flow of microemulsions during surfactant flushing of contaminated soil.
Ouyan Y; Cho JS; Mansell RS
Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11766810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of groundwater flux on contaminant concentration and mass discharge in the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminated zone.
Zhu J; Sun D
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():158-164. PubMed ID: 27500747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of heterogeneity on mass flux from DNAPL source zones: an experimental investigation.
Page JW; Soga K; Illangasekare T
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Dec; 94(3-4):215-34. PubMed ID: 17706832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aquifer remediation using surfactant-enhanced gas sparging applied to target the contaminant source.
Cho MY; Oh MS; Annable MD; Kim H
J Contam Hydrol; 2022 Jun; 248():104002. PubMed ID: 35395442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.
Saenton S; Illangasekare TH; Soga K; Saba TA
J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Nov; 59(1-2):27-44. PubMed ID: 12683638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oscillatory hydraulic testing as a strategy for NAPL source zone monitoring: Laboratory experiments.
Zhou Y; Cardiff M
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 May; 200():24-34. PubMed ID: 28366611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Density-modified displacement for dense nonaqueous-phase liquid source-zone remediation: density conversion using a partitioning alcohol.
Ramsburg CA; Pennell KD
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(9):2082-7. PubMed ID: 12026997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remediation of NAPL-contaminated porous media using micro-nano ozone bubbles: Bench-scale experiments.
Kwon H; Mohamed MM; Annable MD; Kim H
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Jan; 228():103563. PubMed ID: 31761389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of residual NAPL source removal techniques in 3D metric scale experiments.
Atteia O; Jousse F; Cohen G; Höhener P
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Jul; 202():23-32. PubMed ID: 28528771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of nonionic surfactant partitioning on the dissolution kinetics of residual perchloroethylene in a model porous medium.
Sharmin R; Ioannidis MA; Legge RL
J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):145-64. PubMed ID: 16274842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL.
Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
