These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28281884)

  • 1. Enhanced removal of NAPL constituent from aquifer during surfactant flushing with aqueous hydraulic barriers of high viscosity.
    Ahn D; Choi JK; Kim H
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jun; 52(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 28281884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporary hydraulic barriers using organic gel for enhanced aquifer remediation during groundwater flushing: Bench-scale experiments.
    Oh MS; Annable MD; Kim H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2023 Apr; 255():104143. PubMed ID: 36773413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced removal of VOCs from aquifers during air sparging using thickeners and surfactants: Bench-scale experiments.
    Kim H; Ahn D; Annable MD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Jan; 184():25-34. PubMed ID: 26697745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of increased groundwater viscosity on the remedial performance of surfactant-enhanced air sparging.
    Choi JK; Kim H; Kwon H; Annable MD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Mar; 210():42-49. PubMed ID: 29502850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In situ stabilization of NAPL contaminant source-zones as a remediation technique to reduce mass discharge and flux to groundwater.
    Mateas DJ; Tick GR; Carroll KC
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():40-56. PubMed ID: 28780996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced mass removal and flux reduction in 3D correlated permeability fields using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Zhang C; Werth CJ; Webb AG
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):116-26. PubMed ID: 18676059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in air flow patterns using surfactants and thickeners during air sparging: bench-scale experiments.
    Kim J; Kim H; Annable MD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():1-9. PubMed ID: 25462638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical modelling of the impact of surfactant partitioning on surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation.
    Babaei M; Copty NK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():69-81. PubMed ID: 30691860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissolution and remobilization of NAPL in surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation from microscopic scale simulations.
    Ramezanzadeh M; Aminnaji M; Rezanezhad F; Ghazanfari MH; Babaei M
    Chemosphere; 2022 Feb; 289():133177. PubMed ID: 34890610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated formation and flow of microemulsions during surfactant flushing of contaminated soil.
    Ouyan Y; Cho JS; Mansell RS
    Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11766810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significance of groundwater flux on contaminant concentration and mass discharge in the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminated zone.
    Zhu J; Sun D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():158-164. PubMed ID: 27500747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The significance of heterogeneity on mass flux from DNAPL source zones: an experimental investigation.
    Page JW; Soga K; Illangasekare T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Dec; 94(3-4):215-34. PubMed ID: 17706832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aquifer remediation using surfactant-enhanced gas sparging applied to target the contaminant source.
    Cho MY; Oh MS; Annable MD; Kim H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2022 Jun; 248():104002. PubMed ID: 35395442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.
    Saenton S; Illangasekare TH; Soga K; Saba TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Nov; 59(1-2):27-44. PubMed ID: 12683638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oscillatory hydraulic testing as a strategy for NAPL source zone monitoring: Laboratory experiments.
    Zhou Y; Cardiff M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 May; 200():24-34. PubMed ID: 28366611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Density-modified displacement for dense nonaqueous-phase liquid source-zone remediation: density conversion using a partitioning alcohol.
    Ramsburg CA; Pennell KD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(9):2082-7. PubMed ID: 12026997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remediation of NAPL-contaminated porous media using micro-nano ozone bubbles: Bench-scale experiments.
    Kwon H; Mohamed MM; Annable MD; Kim H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Jan; 228():103563. PubMed ID: 31761389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of residual NAPL source removal techniques in 3D metric scale experiments.
    Atteia O; Jousse F; Cohen G; Höhener P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Jul; 202():23-32. PubMed ID: 28528771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of nonionic surfactant partitioning on the dissolution kinetics of residual perchloroethylene in a model porous medium.
    Sharmin R; Ioannidis MA; Legge RL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):145-64. PubMed ID: 16274842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL.
    Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.