These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28282098)

  • 1. Bayesian network as a support tool for rapid query of the environmental multimedia distribution of nanomaterials.
    Bilal M; Liu H; Liu R; Cohen Y
    Nanoscale; 2017 Mar; 9(12):4162-4174. PubMed ID: 28282098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation tool for assessing the release and environmental distribution of nanomaterials.
    Liu HH; Bilal M; Lazareva A; Keller A; Cohen Y
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():938-51. PubMed ID: 25977865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials.
    Liu HH; Cohen Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Mar; 48(6):3281-92. PubMed ID: 24548277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters.
    Suhendra E; Chang CH; Hou WC; Hsieh YC
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 32604975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.
    Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 May; 29(5):1036-48. PubMed ID: 20821538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model.
    Garner KL; Suh S; Keller AA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(10):5541-5551. PubMed ID: 28443660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Bornhöft NA; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4701-11. PubMed ID: 27043743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the fate and end-of-life phase of engineered nanomaterials in the Japanese construction sector.
    Suzuki S; Part F; Matsufuji Y; Huber-Humer M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Feb; 72():389-398. PubMed ID: 29196056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the detection, fate and effects of engineered nanomaterials in wastewater treatment plants.
    Neale PA; Jämting ÅK; Escher BI; Herrmann J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1440-53. PubMed ID: 24135091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental behavior of engineered nanomaterials in porous media: a review.
    Park CM; Chu KH; Heo J; Her N; Jang M; Son A; Yoon Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 May; 309():133-50. PubMed ID: 26882524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecological nanotoxicology: integrating nanomaterial hazard considerations across the subcellular, population, community, and ecosystems levels.
    Holden PA; Nisbet RM; Lenihan HS; Miller RJ; Cherr GN; Schimel JP; Gardea-Torresdey JL
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 23039211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment.
    Gottschalk F; Lassen C; Kjoelholt J; Christensen F; Nowack B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 May; 12(5):5581-602. PubMed ID: 26006129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1145-55. PubMed ID: 21387066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multimedia environmental model of chemical distribution: fate, transport, and uncertainty analysis.
    Luo Y; Yang X
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(8):1396-407. PubMed ID: 17095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current limitations and challenges in nanowaste detection, characterisation and monitoring.
    Part F; Zecha G; Causon T; Sinner EK; Huber-Humer M
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():407-20. PubMed ID: 26117420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidance for the prognostic risk assessment of nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems.
    Koelmans AA; Diepens NJ; Velzeboer I; Besseling E; Quik JT; van de Meent D
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 535():141-9. PubMed ID: 25684040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Envisioning Nano Release Dynamics in a Changing World: Using Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling to Assess Future Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Mitrano DM; Bornhöft NA; Scheringer M; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):2854-2863. PubMed ID: 28157288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of engineered nanomaterials in the construction industry with specific emphasis on paints and their flows in construction and demolition waste in Switzerland.
    Hincapié I; Caballero-Guzman A; Hiltbrunner D; Nowack B
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():398-406. PubMed ID: 26164852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local Scale Exposure and Fate of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Poikkimäki M; Quik JTK; Säämänen A; Dal Maso M
    Toxics; 2022 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 35878259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.