These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Peer review in forensic science. Ballantyne KN; Edmond G; Found B Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():66-76. PubMed ID: 28622536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations. Kelty SF; Julian R; Bruenisholz E; Wilson-Wilde L Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():21-28. PubMed ID: 29427705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice. Roberts P Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Cooper GS; Meterko V Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. Thompson WC; Scurich N J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research. Howes LM Sci Justice; 2015 Mar; 55(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25754001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices. Bali AS; Edmond G; Ballantyne KN; Kemp RI; Martire KA Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 32381238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency. Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How do forensic scientists learn to become competent in casework reporting in practice: a theoretical and empirical approach. Doak S; Assimakopoulos D Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16884877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias. Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis. Roberts P Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Jackson G; Jones S; Booth G; Champod C; Evett IW Sci Justice; 2006; 46(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 16878783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners. Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images. Edmond G Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive-psychology expertise and the calculation of the probability of a wrongful conviction. Rouder JN; Wixted JT; Christenfeld NJS Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2380-2388. PubMed ID: 29740762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element. Dror IE Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]