These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28284920)

  • 1. Tensile and shear methods for measuring strength of bilayer tablets.
    Chang SY; Li JX; Sun CC
    Int J Pharm; 2017 May; 523(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 28284920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of compaction properties and interfacial topography on the performance of bilayer tablets.
    Kottala N; Abebe A; Sprockel O; Akseli I; Nikfar F; Cuitiño AM
    Int J Pharm; 2012 Oct; 436(1-2):171-8. PubMed ID: 22728259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of breaking tests for the characterization of the interfacial strength of bilayer tablets.
    Castrati L; Mazel V; Busignies V; Diarra H; Rossi A; Colombo P; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27717917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of tablet characteristics from residual stress distribution estimated by the finite element method.
    Hayashi Y; Miura T; Shimada T; Onuki Y; Obata Y; Takayama K
    J Pharm Sci; 2013 Oct; 102(10):3678-86. PubMed ID: 23897300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum Interfacial Bonding Strength for Bilayer Tablets Determined Using a Survival Test.
    Chang SY; Sun CC
    Pharm Res; 2019 Jul; 36(10):139. PubMed ID: 31359156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Note on the Use of Diametrical Compression to Determine Tablet Tensile Strength.
    Hilden J; Polizzi M; Zettler A
    J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 106(1):418-421. PubMed ID: 27686682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigations into the tensile failure of doubly-convex cylindrical tablets under diametral loading using finite element methodology.
    Podczeck F; Drake KR; Newton JM
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Sep; 454(1):412-24. PubMed ID: 23834836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound transmission measurements for tensile strength evaluation of tablets.
    Simonaho SP; Takala TA; Kuosmanen M; Ketolainen J
    Int J Pharm; 2011 May; 409(1-2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21356298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interfacial bonding in formulated bilayer tablets.
    Chang SY; Sun CC
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2020 Feb; 147():69-75. PubMed ID: 31870828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of manufacturing process parameters causing multilayer tablets delamination.
    Bellini M; Walther M; Bodmeier R
    Int J Pharm; 2019 Oct; 570():118607. PubMed ID: 31421200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Degree of compression as a potential process control tool of tablet tensile strength.
    Nordström J; Alderborn G
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2011; 16(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 20649411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of a new co-processed dry binder based on spray-dried lactose and microcrystalline cellulose.
    Mužíková J; Sináglová P
    Ceska Slov Farm; 2013 Jun; 62(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 23961814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive model for tensile strength of pharmaceutical tablets based on local hardness measurements.
    Juban A; Nouguier-Lehon C; Briancon S; Hoc T; Puel F
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Jul; 490(1-2):438-45. PubMed ID: 26043825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cellactose a co-processed excipient: a comparison study.
    Arida AI; Al-Tabakha MM
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2008; 13(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 18379907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of solid dosage porosity and tensile strength with acoustically extracted mechanical properties.
    Xu X; Mack C; Cleland ZJ; Vallabh CKP; Dave VS; Cetinkaya C
    Int J Pharm; 2018 May; 542(1-2):153-163. PubMed ID: 29535040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compressibility of tableting materials and properties of tablets with glyceryl behenate.
    Mužíková J; Muchová S; Komersová A; Lochař V
    Acta Pharm; 2015 Mar; 65(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 25781708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The granule porosity controls the loss of compactibility for both dry- and wet-processed cellulose granules but at different rate.
    Nordström J; Alderborn G
    J Pharm Sci; 2015 Jun; 104(6):2029-2039. PubMed ID: 25872760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A formulation strategy for solving the overgranulation problem in high shear wet granulation.
    Osei-Yeboah F; Zhang M; Feng Y; Sun CC
    J Pharm Sci; 2014 Aug; 103(8):2434-40. PubMed ID: 24985120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of percolation model to the tensile strength and the reduced modulus of elasticity of three compacted pharmaceutical excipients.
    Busignies V; Leclerc B; Porion P; Evesque P; Couarraze G; Tchoreloff P
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2007 Sep; 67(2):507-14. PubMed ID: 17383863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new brittleness index for compacted tablets.
    Sonnergaard JM
    J Pharm Sci; 2013 Dec; 102(12):4347-52. PubMed ID: 24258281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.