These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28285238)

  • 21. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
    Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Granular iron oxide adsorbents to control natural organic matter and membrane fouling in ultrafiltration water treatment.
    Cui X; Choo KH
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4227-37. PubMed ID: 23764573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low maintenance gravity-driven membrane filtration using hollow fibers: Effect of reducing space for biofilm growth and control strategies on permeate flux.
    Stoffel D; Rigo E; Derlon N; Staaks C; Heijnen M; Morgenroth E; Jacquin C
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 811():152307. PubMed ID: 34914997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microcystis aeruginosa-laden surface water treatment using ultrafiltration: Membrane fouling, cell integrity and extracellular organic matter rejection.
    Liu B; Qu F; Liang H; Van der Bruggen B; Cheng X; Yu H; Xu G; Li G
    Water Res; 2017 Apr; 112():83-92. PubMed ID: 28142092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of natural water after pretreatment to different extents.
    Ao L; Liu W; Zhao L; Wang X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():234-243. PubMed ID: 27155429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of cellulose acetate/polyphenylsulfone derivatives to fabricate ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes for the removal of arsenic from drinking water.
    Kumar M; RaoT S; Isloor AM; Ibrahim GPS; Inamuddin ; Ismail N; Ismail AF; Asiri AM
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 May; 129():715-727. PubMed ID: 30738161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different waters.
    Tian JY; Ernst M; Cui F; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2013 Mar; 47(3):1218-28. PubMed ID: 23245542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of membrane configuration on bench-scale MF and UF fouling experiments.
    Howe KJ; Marwah A; Chiu KP; Adham SS
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3842-9. PubMed ID: 17582459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of sludge retention on UF membrane fouling: The significance of sludge crystallization and EPS increase.
    Yu W; Graham N; Yang Y; Zhou Z; Campos LC
    Water Res; 2015 Oct; 83():319-28. PubMed ID: 26179638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved performance of gravity-driven membrane filtration for seawater pretreatment: Implications of membrane module configuration.
    Wu B; Christen T; Tan HS; Hochstrasser F; Suwarno SR; Liu X; Chong TH; Burkhardt M; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2017 May; 114():59-68. PubMed ID: 28226250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
    Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems.
    Campinas M; Rosa MJ
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1636-44. PubMed ID: 19944444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficient control of membrane fouling in MF by removal of biopolymers: Comparison of various pretreatments.
    Kimura K; Oki Y
    Water Res; 2017 May; 115():172-179. PubMed ID: 28279938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fouling and chemically enhanced backwashing performance of low-pressure membranes during the treatment of shale gas produced water.
    Liu N; Yang J; Hu X; Zhao H; Chang H; Liang Y; Pang L; Meng Y; Liang H
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 840():156664. PubMed ID: 35700787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of UF membrane fouling mechanisms caused by organic interactions in seawater.
    Resosudarmo A; Ye Y; Le-Clech P; Chen V
    Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):911-21. PubMed ID: 23219388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.