These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28286478)

  • 1. Cortical Alpha Oscillations Predict Speech Intelligibility.
    Dimitrijevic A; Smith ML; Kadis DS; Moore DR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():88. PubMed ID: 28286478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.
    Hunter CR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 32282402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracerebral ERD/ERS in voluntary movement and in cognitive visuomotor task.
    Rektor I; Sochůrková D; Bocková M
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():311-30. PubMed ID: 17071240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alpha Oscillations During Effortful Continuous Speech: From Scalp EEG to Ear-EEG.
    Ala TS; Alickovic E; Cabrera AF; Whitmer WM; Hadley LV; Rank ML; Lunner T; Graversen C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 70(4):1264-1273. PubMed ID: 36227816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
    Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain oscillatory 1-30 Hz EEG ERD/ERS responses during the different stages of an auditory memory search task.
    Pesonen M; Björnberg CH; Hämäläinen H; Krause CM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 399(1-2):45-50. PubMed ID: 16490308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain oscillatory 4-30 Hz responses during a visual n-back memory task with varying memory load.
    Pesonen M; Hämäläinen H; Krause CM
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():171-7. PubMed ID: 17270151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic modulation of shared sensory and motor cortical rhythms mediates speech and non-speech discrimination performance.
    Bowers AL; Saltuklaroglu T; Harkrider A; Wilson M; Toner MA
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():366. PubMed ID: 24847290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and Working Memory-Related EEG Markers of Subtle Cognitive Deterioration in Healthy Elderly Individuals.
    Deiber MP; Meziane HB; Hasler R; Rodriguez C; Toma S; Ackermann M; Herrmann F; Giannakopoulos P
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 47(2):335-49. PubMed ID: 26401557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the role of temporal lobe activation in speech perception accuracy with normal hearing adults: An event-related fNIRS study.
    Defenderfer J; Kerr-German A; Hedrick M; Buss AT
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():31-41. PubMed ID: 28888891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.