271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28287192)
1. Free will, neuroscience, and choice: towards a decisional capacity model for insanity defense evaluations.
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Tarsitani L; Biondi M; Ferracuti S
Riv Psichiatr; 2017; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28287192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
Silva JA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
Kalis A; Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry.
Meynen G
J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26674511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overlapping universe: understanding legal insanity and psychosis.
Torry ZD; Billick SB
Psychiatr Q; 2010 Sep; 81(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20373024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In defense of free will: Neuroscience and criminal responsibility.
Nestor PG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101344. PubMed ID: 29685647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
Young G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAPL Practice Guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL)
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4 Suppl):S3-S76. PubMed ID: 25492121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of the american law institute test for insanity in Oregon: focus on diagnosis.
Lockey CJ; Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 17872554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In quest of constitutional principles of "neurolaw".
Pizzetti FG
Med Secoli; 2011; 23(3):963-90. PubMed ID: 23057208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ethical framework for assessments of criminal responsibility: applying Susan Wolf's account of sanity to forensic psychiatry.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22627087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry.
Schneider RD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 20018998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
