241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28287823)
21. Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study.
Patterson K; Yap LC; Elamin M; Maccraith E; Muheilan M; Sharif A; McGuinness G; Darcy F; Brady C; Hennessey D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 May; 53(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 33386582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Maia RS; de Almeida Artifon EL; Otoch JP; Da Cruz JAS
Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):37. PubMed ID: 38413490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.
Ali AI; Eldakhakhny A; Abdelfadel A; Rohiem MF; Elbadry M; Hassan A
World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 35895116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single-Use Ureteroscopy and Environmental Footprint: Review of Current Evidence.
Brown G; Ong A; Juliebø-Jones P; Davis NF; Skolarikos A; Somani B
Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Jun; 24(6):281-285. PubMed ID: 36917340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.
Salvadó JA; Cabello JM; Moreno S; Cabello R; Olivares R; Velasco A
Cent European J Urol; 2019; 72(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 31720031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Qi S; Yang E; Bao J; Yang N; Guo H; Wang G; Li N; Cui X; Gao W; Ou T; Wang J; Wang Z; Niu Y
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31432716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.
Mazzucchi E; Marchini GS; Berto FCG; Denstedt J; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Torricelli FCM; Battagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC
Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(3):456-467. PubMed ID: 34786927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Initial experience of comparison between two slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Indoscope Sleek (Bioradmedisys™) Versus Uscope PU3033A (Pusen™): A single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Survase P; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Sabnis RB; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2817-2821. PubMed ID: 37543971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Evaluation of Longevity, the Factors that Affect it, and Damage Mechanisms.
Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Zanetti SP; Catellani M; Oussoren HW; de la Rosette JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 29534873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A single center comparative study of two single use digital flexible ureteroscopy in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm.
Zanaty F; Elshazly M; Kandeel H; Salman B
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):777-782. PubMed ID: 36700975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the Ergonomics of Flexible Ureteroscopy.
Ludwig WW; Lee G; Ziemba JB; Ko JS; Matlaga BR
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1062-1066. PubMed ID: 28817961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study.
Taguchi K; Harper JD; Stoller ML; Duty BD; Sorensen MD; Sur RL; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Wenzler DL; Isaacson D; Xu A; Chu C; Zaid UB; Taylor ER; Ramaswamy K; Chi T
Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):559-566. PubMed ID: 29224057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting Urinary Stone Composition in Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopic Images with a Convolutional Neural Network.
Oh KT; Jun DY; Choi JY; Jung DC; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jul; 59(8):. PubMed ID: 37629690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
