250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28287834)
1. Retrofitting Real-Life Dexcom G5 Data.
Favero SD; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 28287834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrofitting of continuous glucose monitoring traces allows more accurate assessment of glucose control in outpatient studies.
Del Favero S; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C;
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 May; 17(5):355-63. PubMed ID: 25671379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hypoglycemic Accuracy and Improved Low Glucose Alerts of the Latest Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
Peyser TA; Nakamura K; Price D; Bohnett LC; Hirsch IB; Balo A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Aug; 17(8):548-54. PubMed ID: 25961446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
Laffel L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Garg SK; Smith J; Beatson C; Lopez-Baca B; Voelmle M; Gottlieb PA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Feb; 11(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 19243265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Between Abdominal and Upper Arm Insertion Sites.
Steineck IIK; Mahmoudi Z; Ranjan A; Schmidt S; Jørgensen JB; Nørgaard K
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 30994362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.
Zaharieva DP; Turksoy K; McGaugh SM; Pooni R; Vienneau T; Ly T; Riddell MC
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(6):313-321. PubMed ID: 31059282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Personalized Week-to-Week Updating Algorithm to Improve Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance.
Zavitsanou S; Lee JB; Pinsker JE; Church MM; Doyle FJ; Dassau E
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1070-1079. PubMed ID: 29032732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a CGM Sensor in Pediatric Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes. Comparison of Three Insertion Sites: Arm, Abdomen, and Gluteus.
Faccioli S; Del Favero S; Visentin R; Bonfanti R; Iafusco D; Rabbone I; Marigliano M; Schiaffini R; Bruttomesso D; Cobelli C;
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1147-1154. PubMed ID: 28486841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Type-1 Diabetes Patient Decision Simulator for In Silico Testing Safety and Effectiveness of Insulin Treatments.
Vettoretti M; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Jun; 65(6):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 28866479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety comparison of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wojciechowski P; Ryś P; Lipowska A; Gawęska M; Małecki MT
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2011 Oct; 121(10):333-43. PubMed ID: 22045094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.
Bailey TS; Chang A; Christiansen M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 25370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.
Bailey T; Zisser H; Chang A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Dec; 11(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 20001675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter outpatient dinner/overnight reduction of hypoglycemia and increased time of glucose in target with a wearable artificial pancreas using modular model predictive control in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Del Favero S; Place J; Kropff J; Messori M; Keith-Hynes P; Visentin R; Monaro M; Galasso S; Boscari F; Toffanin C; Di Palma F; Lanzola G; Scarpellini S; Farret A; Kovatchev B; Avogaro A; Bruttomesso D; Magni L; DeVries JH; Cobelli C; Renard E;
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2015 May; 17(5):468-76. PubMed ID: 25600304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy on Clinicians' Retrospective Decision Making in Diabetes: A Pilot Study.
Mahmoudi Z; Johansen MD; Nørgaard HH; Andersen S; Pedersen-Bjergaard U; Tarnow L; Christiansen JS; Hejlesen O
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(5):1092-102. PubMed ID: 26055082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
