BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28287942)

  • 1. FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging.
    Lakhani A; Khan SR; Bharwani N; Stewart V; Rockall AG; Khan S; Barwick TD
    Radiographics; 2017; 37(2):577-594. PubMed ID: 28287942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging of gynecologic malignancies with FDG PET-CT: case examples, physiologic activity, and pitfalls.
    De Gaetano AM; Calcagni ML; Rufini V; Valentini AL; Gui B; Giordano A; Bonomo L
    Abdom Imaging; 2009 Nov; 34(6):696-711. PubMed ID: 18791682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal Variants and Pitfalls Encountered in PET Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
    Yu JQ; Doss M; Alpaugh RK
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):249-268. PubMed ID: 29482753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.
    Torizuka T; Kanno T; Futatsubashi M; Okada H; Yoshikawa E; Nakamura F; Takekuma M; Maeda M; Ouchi Y
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12843219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gynecologic oncologic imaging with PET/CT.
    Grant P; Sakellis C; Jacene HA
    Semin Nucl Med; 2014; 44(6):461-78. PubMed ID: 25362236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectrum of PET-CT pelvic pitfalls in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
    Gorospe L; Jover-Díaz R; Vicente-Bártulos A
    Abdom Imaging; 2012 Dec; 37(6):1041-65. PubMed ID: 22349805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in benign, nonphysiologic lesions found on whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT): accumulated data from four years of experience with PET/CT.
    Metser U; Even-Sapir E
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 May; 37(3):206-22. PubMed ID: 17418153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of pelvic malignancies with in-line FDG PET-CT: case examples and common pitfalls of FDG PET.
    Subhas N; Patel PV; Pannu HK; Jacene HA; Fishman EK; Wahl RL
    Radiographics; 2005; 25(4):1031-43. PubMed ID: 16009822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDG PET-CT of gynecologic cancers: pearls and pitfalls.
    Prabhakar HB; Kraeft JJ; Schorge JO; Scott JA; Lee SI
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2472-85. PubMed ID: 25680500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants.
    Shreve PD; Anzai Y; Wahl RL
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(1):61-77; quiz 150-1. PubMed ID: 9925392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genitourinary involvement of lymphomas on FDG-PET.
    Naik N; Lin M; Lin P
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170273. PubMed ID: 29322833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for detection of recurrent, 131I-negative thyroid cancer.
    Finkelstein SE; Grigsby PW; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Moley JF; Hall BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):286-92. PubMed ID: 17882493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-time point
    Parghane RV; Basu S
    Semin Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 47(4):373-391. PubMed ID: 28583277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pitfalls in Interpretation of PET/CT in the Chest.
    Strange C; Shroff GS; Truong MT; Rohren EM
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2021 Dec; 42(6):588-598. PubMed ID: 34895614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies.
    Tripathy S; Parida GK; Kumar R
    PET Clin; 2018 Apr; 13(2):269-288. PubMed ID: 29482754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls in [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging in gynecological malignancies.
    Hernandez Pampaloni M; Facchetti L; Nardo L
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jun; 60(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 26937887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. F18-FDG coincidence-PET in patients with suspected gynecological malignancy.
    Zor E; Stokkel MP; Ozalp S; Vardareli E; Yalçin OT; Ak I
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 16875342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of FDG-PET/CT in gynaecological cancers.
    Rockall AG; Cross S; Flanagan S; Moore E; Avril N
    Cancer Imaging; 2012 Mar; 12(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 22391444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PET/CT Limitations and Pitfalls in Urogenital Cancers.
    Vasireddi A; Nguyen NC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2021 Nov; 51(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 34243903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.