BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28288356)

  • 1. The effect of prices on nutrition: Comparing the impact of product- and nutrient-specific taxes.
    Harding M; Lovenheim M
    J Health Econ; 2017 May; 53():53-71. PubMed ID: 28288356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
    Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.
    Bleich SN; Dunn CG; Soto MJ; Yan J; Gibson LA; Lawman HG; Mitra N; Lowery CM; Peterhans A; Hua SV; Roberto CA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113527. PubMed ID: 34129022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a price increase on purchases of sugar sweetened beverages. Results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Waterlander WE; Ni Mhurchu C; Steenhuis IH
    Appetite; 2014 Jul; 78():32-9. PubMed ID: 24667153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promoting Healthier Purchases: Ultraprocessed Food Taxes and Minimally Processed Foods Subsidies for the Low Income.
    Valizadeh P; Ng SW
    Am J Prev Med; 2024 Jul; 67(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 38573260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soda Taxes Take Off Across the Country.
    Kuehn BM
    Circulation; 2017 Aug; 136(5):500-501. PubMed ID: 28760872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taxes and front-of-package labels improve the healthiness of beverage and snack purchases: a randomized experimental marketplace.
    Acton RB; Jones AC; Kirkpatrick SI; Roberto CA; Hammond D
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 May; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 31113448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-Year Evaluation of Mexico's Tax on Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods: An Observational Study.
    Batis C; Rivera JA; Popkin BM; Taillie LS
    PLoS Med; 2016 Jul; 13(7):e1002057. PubMed ID: 27379797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impacts on food purchases and tax revenues of a tax based on Chile's nutrient profiling model.
    Colchero MA; Paraje G; Popkin BM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260693. PubMed ID: 34855853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retailer-Led Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Price Increase Reduces Purchases in a Hospital Convenience Store in Melbourne, Australia: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.
    Blake MR; Peeters A; Lancsar E; Boelsen-Robinson T; Corben K; Stevenson CE; Palermo C; Backholer K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1027-1036.e8. PubMed ID: 28870846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and affordability of soft drinks in Chile: A time series analysis.
    Cuadrado C; Dunstan J; Silva-Illanes N; Mirelman AJ; Nakamura R; Suhrcke M
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan; 245():112708. PubMed ID: 31862547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.
    Cawley J; Frisvold D; Hill A; Jones D
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100865. PubMed ID: 32126505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of the French soda tax on prices and purchases. An ex post evaluation.
    Capacci S; Allais O; Bonnet C; Mazzocchi M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223196. PubMed ID: 31603901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of food price changes on consumer purchases: a randomised experiment.
    Waterlander WE; Jiang Y; Nghiem N; Eyles H; Wilson N; Cleghorn C; Genç M; Swinburn B; Mhurchu CN; Blakely T
    Lancet Public Health; 2019 Aug; 4(8):e394-e405. PubMed ID: 31376858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economics and obesity policy.
    Lusk JL
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2017 Jun; 41(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 28077861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do High Consumers of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Respond Differently to Price Changes? A Finite Mixture IV-Tobit Approach.
    Etilé F; Sharma A
    Health Econ; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1147-63. PubMed ID: 25676493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in Ecuador: An analysis across different income and consumption groups.
    Segovia J; Orellana M; Sarmiento JP; Carchi D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240546. PubMed ID: 33048990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.
    Powell LM; Leider J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2031083. PubMed ID: 33369659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts?
    Schmacker R; Smed S
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100864. PubMed ID: 32145515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study.
    Leider J; Li Y; Powell LM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244884. PubMed ID: 33395444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.