These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28289936)

  • 1. Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration.
    Kim YS; Song JS; Kannengiesser S; Seo SY
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4120-4128. PubMed ID: 28289936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements.
    Zhan C; Kannengiesser S; Chandarana H; Fenchel M; Ream J; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1825-1833. PubMed ID: 30796479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography.
    Yoon JW; Lee ES; Park HJ; Park SB; Cho YY; Kannengiesser S; Hur J
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Jul; 28(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 35950274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
    Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.
    Kim YS; Jang YN; Song JS
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1709-1718. PubMed ID: 29164384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.
    Choi SL; Lee ES; Ko A; Park HJ; Park SB; Choi BI; Cho YY; Kannengiesser S
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1730-1737. PubMed ID: 31728687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study.
    Shi Y; Xia F; Li QJ; Li JH; Yu B; Li Y; An H; Glaser KJ; Tao S; Ehman RL; Guo QY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 111(6):823-33. PubMed ID: 26977760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver MR Elastography at 3 T: Agreement Across Pulse Sequences and Effect of Liver R2* on Image Quality.
    Felker ER; Choi KS; Sung K; Wu HH; Raman SS; Bolster BD; Kannengiesser S; Sorge K; Lu DSK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):588-594. PubMed ID: 29995500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR elastography in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease at 1.5T: Intraindividual comparison of gradient-recalled echo versus spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences and investigation of potential confounding factors.
    Plaikner M; Kremser C; Zoller H; Kannengiesser S; Henninger B
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109898. PubMed ID: 34388628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim DW; Kim SY; Yoon HM; Kim KW; Byun JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 31456328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner.
    Abe R; Fukuzawa K; Yoshihara C; Tano M; Saitoh S
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Mar; 49(3):694-702. PubMed ID: 38012395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.
    Calle-Toro JS; Serai SD; Hartung EA; Goldberg DJ; Bolster BD; Darge K; Anupindi SA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 30600386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Gradient-Echo and Spin-Echo EPI MR Elastography at 3 T in quantifying liver stiffness of patients with and without iron overload; a prospective study.
    Hazhirkarzar B; Wu Q; Tang H; Baghdadi A; Motaghi M; Habibabadi RR; Shaghaghi M; Ghadimi M; Borhani A; Mohseni A; Pan L; BolsterJr BD; Kamel IR
    Clin Imaging; 2023 Aug; 100():42-47. PubMed ID: 37196504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.
    Morisaka H; Motosugi U; Glaser KJ; Ichikawa S; Ehman RL; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Onishi H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 27662640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Park SJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():46-53. PubMed ID: 30292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.
    Co M; Dong H; Boulter DJ; Nguyen XV; Khan SN; Raterman B; Klamer B; Kolipaka A; Walter BA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 35289470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance elastography for estimating in vivo stiffness of the abdominal aorta using cardiac-gated spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a feasibility study.
    Dong H; Jin N; Kannengiesser S; Raterman B; White RD; Kolipaka A
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Jan; 34(1):e4420. PubMed ID: 33021342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of advanced hepatic MR elastography methods for susceptibility artifact suppression in clinical patients.
    Wang J; Glaser KJ; Zhang T; Shan Q; He B; Chen J; Yin M; Dzyubak B; Kugel JL; Kruse SA; Grimm RC; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 28801939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.
    Jang W; Jo S; Song JS; Hwang HP; Kim SH
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Aug; 46(8):3889-3907. PubMed ID: 33770223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.