763 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28290111)
21. Unique Variable Analysis: A Network Psychometrics Method to Detect Local Dependence.
Christensen AP; Garrido LE; Golino H
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(6):1165-1182. PubMed ID: 37139938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A penalized likelihood method for multi-group structural equation modelling.
Huang PH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 29500879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data.
Epskamp S; Waldorp LJ; Mõttus R; Borsboom D
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):453-480. PubMed ID: 29658809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comparison of Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Network Models for Measurement Invariance Assessment When Indicator Residuals are Correlated.
Finch WH; French BF; Hazelwood A
Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):106-122. PubMed ID: 36875291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern?
Breckler SJ
Psychol Bull; 1990 Mar; 107(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 2320704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How to Compare Psychometric Factor and Network Models.
Kan KJ; de Jonge H; van der Maas HLJ; Levine SZ; Epskamp S
J Intell; 2020 Oct; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 33023229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach.
Proust-Lima C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 26376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploratory Procedure for Component-Based Structural Equation Modeling for Simple Structure by Simultaneous Rotation.
Yamashita N
Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):411-438. PubMed ID: 38085454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bayesian Comparison of Latent Variable Models: Conditional Versus Marginal Likelihoods.
Merkle EC; Furr D; Rabe-Hesketh S
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):802-829. PubMed ID: 31297664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Wolfe EW; Singh K
J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An Introduction to Network Psychometrics: Relating Ising Network Models to Item Response Theory Models.
Marsman M; Borsboom D; Kruis J; Epskamp S; van Bork R; Waldorp LJ; Maas HLJV; Maris G
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 29111774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of single-level and multi-level Rasch models using the lme4 package.
Lamprianou I
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 23442329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating measurement models in clinical research: covariance structure analysis of latent variable models of self-conception.
Hoyle RH
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1991 Feb; 59(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 2002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure.
McGrath RE; Walters GD
Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):284-93. PubMed ID: 22251269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.
Nestler S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):870-889. PubMed ID: 33094388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fitting direct covariance structures by the MSTRUCT modeling language of the CALIS procedure.
Yung YF; Browne MW; Zhang W
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):178-93. PubMed ID: 24483142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Internal Structure of Responses to the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
Perera HN
J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):411-23. PubMed ID: 25774661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
Clark DA; Bowles RP
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis.
Cavicchia C; Vichi M
Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 34403112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-mode factor analysis by means of Candecomp/Parafac.
Stegeman A; Lam TT
Psychometrika; 2014 Jul; 79(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 24271506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
