162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28290342)
1. A retrospective audit of the first screening round of the Maltese breast screening programme.
Mizzi D; Zarb F; Dennis A
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 28290342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The effectiveness of population-based breast cancer screening programme].
Szynglarewicz B; Matkowski R; Kasprzak P; Kotowska J; Forgacz J; Pudełko M; Kornafel J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Feb; 26(152):117-20. PubMed ID: 19388515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial.
Veenhuizen SGA; de Lange SV; Bakker MF; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; van Gils CH; Veldhuis WB;
Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):278-286. PubMed ID: 33724062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience.
Shaw CM; Flanagan FL; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 19188311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening organization and recall rate in a regional breast screening programme.
Beruchashwili T; Gvamichava R; Duffy SW
J Med Screen; 2018 Mar; 25(1):55-56. PubMed ID: 28614990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11894707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
