These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291755)

  • 21. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bridging Crystal Engineering and Drug Discovery by Utilizing Intermolecular Interactions and Molecular Shapes in Crystals.
    Spackman PR; Yu LJ; Morton CJ; Parker MW; Bond CS; Spackman MA; Jayatilaka D; Thomas SP
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2019 Nov; 58(47):16780-16784. PubMed ID: 31385643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining self- and cross-docking as benchmark tools: the performance of DockBench in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Salmaso V; Sturlese M; Cuzzolin A; Moro S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):251-264. PubMed ID: 28840418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multipose binding in molecular docking.
    Atkovska K; Samsonov SA; Paszkowski-Rogacz M; Pisabarro MT
    Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Feb; 15(2):2622-45. PubMed ID: 24534807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock.
    Raschka S; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
    Proteins; 2016 Dec; 84(12):1888-1901. PubMed ID: 27699847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands.
    Raman EP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide.
    Aldeghi M; Bluck JP; Biggin PC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():199-232. PubMed ID: 29594774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proper modelling of ligand binding requires an ensemble of bound and unbound states.
    Pearce NM; Krojer T; von Delft F
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):256-266. PubMed ID: 28291761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Binding MOAD, a high-quality protein-ligand database.
    Benson ML; Smith RD; Khazanov NA; Dimcheff B; Beaver J; Dresslar P; Nerothin J; Carlson HA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Jan; 36(Database issue):D674-8. PubMed ID: 18055497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Essential considerations for using protein-ligand structures in drug discovery.
    Warren GL; Do TD; Kelley BP; Nicholls A; Warren SD
    Drug Discov Today; 2012 Dec; 17(23-24):1270-81. PubMed ID: 22728777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP.
    Evrard GX; Langer GG; Perrakis A; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):108-17. PubMed ID: 17164533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved ligand geometries in crystallographic refinement using AFITT in PHENIX.
    Janowski PA; Moriarty NW; Kelley BP; Case DA; York DM; Adams PD; Warren GL
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2016 Sep; 72(Pt 9):1062-72. PubMed ID: 27599738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
    Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Studying protein-ligand interactions using X-ray crystallography.
    Turnbull AP; Emsley P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():457-77. PubMed ID: 23729263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.