These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291761)

  • 1. Proper modelling of ligand binding requires an ensemble of bound and unbound states.
    Pearce NM; Krojer T; von Delft F
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):256-266. PubMed ID: 28291761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring ligand dynamics in protein crystal structures with ensemble refinement.
    Caldararu O; Ekberg V; Logan DT; Oksanen E; Ryde U
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2021 Aug; 77(Pt 8):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 34342282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragmentation-tree density representation for crystallographic modelling of bound ligands.
    Langer GG; Evrard GX; Carolan CG; Lamzin VS
    J Mol Biol; 2012 Jun; 419(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 22446381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conformational energy range of ligands in protein crystal structures: The difficult quest for accurate understanding.
    Peach ML; Cachau RE; Nicklaus MC
    J Mol Recognit; 2017 Aug; 30(8):. PubMed ID: 28233410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tools for ligand validation in Coot.
    Emsley P
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):203-210. PubMed ID: 28291755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling dynamics in protein crystal structures by ensemble refinement.
    Burnley BT; Afonine PV; Adams PD; Gros P
    Elife; 2012 Dec; 1():e00311. PubMed ID: 23251785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic Docking of Macrocycles in Bound and Unbound Protein Structures with DynaDock.
    Meixner M; Zachmann M; Metzler S; Scheerer J; Zacharias M; Antes I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(14):3426-3441. PubMed ID: 35796228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of protein-ligand crystal structures: trust, but verify.
    Deller MC; Rupp B
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Sep; 29(9):817-36. PubMed ID: 25665575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of Protein-Ligand Crystal Structure Models: Small Molecule and Peptide Ligands.
    Pozharski E; Deller MC; Rupp B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1607():611-625. PubMed ID: 28573591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving ranking of models for protein complexes with side chain modeling and atomic potentials.
    Viswanath S; Ravikant DV; Elber R
    Proteins; 2013 Apr; 81(4):592-606. PubMed ID: 23180599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ensemble refinement of protein crystal structures: validation and application.
    Levin EJ; Kondrashov DA; Wesenberg GE; Phillips GN
    Structure; 2007 Sep; 15(9):1040-52. PubMed ID: 17850744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.
    Lorber DM; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 1998 Apr; 7(4):938-50. PubMed ID: 9568900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.
    Neves MA; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 22569591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.
    Brylinski M; Lee SY; Zhou H; Skolnick J
    J Struct Biol; 2011 Mar; 173(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 20850544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved ligand geometries in crystallographic refinement using AFITT in PHENIX.
    Janowski PA; Moriarty NW; Kelley BP; Case DA; York DM; Adams PD; Warren GL
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2016 Sep; 72(Pt 9):1062-72. PubMed ID: 27599738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.