345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291854)
1. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
Tokar E; Uludag B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Low-Profile Stud Attachment Configurations on Stress Distribution Characteristics of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
Tokar E; Uludag B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 30024990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems of mandibular overdentures retained by two or three implants.
Uludag B; Polat S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1509-13. PubMed ID: 23189303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of mucosa thicknesses on stress distribution of implant-supported overdentures under unilateral loading: Photoelastic analysis.
Ozyilmaz OY; Aykent F; Sayin Ozel G
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2019; 17(4):2280800019882645. PubMed ID: 31779504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
Manju V; Sreelal T
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
