BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291860)

  • 1. Virtual Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Facial Prosthetic Reconstruction: A Technical Note.
    Verma S; Gonzalez M; Schow SR; Triplett RG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):e77-e81. PubMed ID: 28291860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial implant surgery.
    Sinn DP; Bedrossian E; Vest AK
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):321-35, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 21492804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of surgical navigational systems for craniofacial bone-anchored implant placement.
    Verma SN; Schow SR; Stone BH; Triplett RG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 20556259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image-Guided Placement of Osseointegrated Implants for Challenging Auricular, Orbital, and Rhinectomy Defects.
    Choi KJ; Sajisevi MB; McClennen J; Kaylie DM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Oct; 125(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 27307422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
    Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Virtual Surgical Planning, Intraoperative Navigation, and 3-Dimensional Printing in Prosthetic-Based Bilateral Microtia Reconstruction.
    Weissler JM; Sosin M; Dorafshar AH; Garcia JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 75(7):1491-1497. PubMed ID: 28137637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolving roles of computer-based technology and smartphone applications in facial plastic surgery.
    Kayastha D; Vakharia KT
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Aug; 27(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 31157662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image data based reconstruction of the midface using a patient-specific implant in combination with a vascularized osteomyocutaneous scapular flap.
    Mertens C; Löwenheim H; Hoffmann J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 23073039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Late Reconstruction of the Orbit With Patient-Specific Implants Using Computer-Aided Planning and Navigation.
    Baumann A; Sinko K; Dorner G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S101-6. PubMed ID: 26608137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual Treatment Planning for Implant-Retained Nasal Prosthesis: A Clinical Report.
    Buzayan MM; Yunus NB; Oon HK; Tawfiq O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):e255-e258. PubMed ID: 29140385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image-guided titanium implantation for craniofacial prosthetics.
    Meltzer NE; Garcia JR; Byrne PJ; Boahene DK
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 19153295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-step primary reconstruction for complex craniofacial resection with PEEK custom-made implants.
    Jalbert F; Boetto S; Nadon F; Lauwers F; Schmidt E; Lopez R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 42(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 23688592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].
    Wilde F; Schramm A
    HNO; 2016 Sep; 64(9):641-9. PubMed ID: 27525666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants.
    Gerbino G; Zavattero E; Zenga F; Bianchi FA; Garzino-Demo P; Berrone S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26242698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The advantages of advanced computer-assisted diagnostics and three-dimensional preoperative planning on implant position in orbital reconstruction.
    Jansen J; Schreurs R; Dubois L; Maal TJJ; Gooris PJJ; Becking AG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 46(4):715-721. PubMed ID: 29548880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.
    D'haese J; Ackhurst J; Wismeijer D; De Bruyn H; Tahmaseb A
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing Guide for Single-Stage Skull Bone Tumor Surgery: Novel Software Workflow with Manufacturing of Prefabricated Jigs for Bone Resection and Reconstruction.
    Wu CT; Lu TC; Chan CS; Lin TC
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e416-e427. PubMed ID: 33359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.
    Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The indication and application of computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery-Shanghai's experience based on 104 cases.
    Yu H; Shen SG; Wang X; Zhang L; Zhang S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):770-4. PubMed ID: 23462802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.