These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291862)

  • 1. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges with Regular or Short Morse Taper Implants.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos MG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):372-376. PubMed ID: 28291862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress in the Posterior Mandible Using Regular and Short Implants, in the Same Context, with Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Pupim D; Zaparolli D; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e199-e206. PubMed ID: 28708912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Surface Stress Distribution on Regular and Short Morse Taper Implants Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Pupim D; Zaparolli D; de Mattos Mda G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):e276-80. PubMed ID: 27046468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different bony ridges with different lengths of morse taper implants and prosthesis dimensions.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos Mda G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1888-92. PubMed ID: 23172434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
    Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of short or standard implants with different prosthetic designs in the posterior mandibular region: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Qin S; Gao Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Sep; 26(12):1499-1509. PubMed ID: 36125258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
    Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Splinted and Nonsplinted Crowns with Different Implant Lengths in the Posterior Maxilla by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago Junior JF; de Souza Batista VE; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():3163096. PubMed ID: 30254726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Stress and Strain Distribution Around Splinted and Nonsplinted 6-mm Short Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Meimandi M; Talebi Ardakani MR; Amid R; Mahmoudi Motlagh A; Beheshti S
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 29334509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Amid R; Rasoolzadeh RA; Motlagh AM; Dehnavi F; Kadkhodazadeh M
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29604944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants.
    Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1176-82. PubMed ID: 22167421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress distribution of three-unit fixed partial prostheses (conventional and pontic) supported by three or two implants: 3D finite element analysis of ductile materials.
    Toniollo MB; Vieira LJP; Dos Santos Sá M; Macedo AP; Melo JP; Terada ASSD
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 May; 22(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 30931631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.
    Zupancic Cepic L; Frank M; Reisinger A; Pahr D; Zechner W; Schedle A
    Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Feb; 8(1):8. PubMed ID: 35147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of narrow dental implants.
    Valera-Jiménez JF; Burgueño-Barris G; Gómez-González S; López-López J; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Fernández-Aguado E
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):927-935. PubMed ID: 32466868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.