1406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28291913)
1. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. WE-E-BRB-07: Direct 3D Fluence Calculation from Machine Beam Parameters for VMAT Delivery Verification.
Yang D; Li H; Sun B; Tan J; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3957. PubMed ID: 28520014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Chow VUY; Kan MWK; Chan ATC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):179-187. PubMed ID: 33073897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA.
O'Daniel JC; Giles W; Cui Y; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5387-5397. PubMed ID: 37475493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35-T lateral magnetic field.
Li HH; Rodriguez VL; Green OL; Hu Y; Kashani R; Wooten HO; Yang D; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25442343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel approach to EPID-based 3D volumetric dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT QA.
Alhazmi A; Gianoli C; Neppl S; Martins J; Veloza S; Podesta M; Verhaegen F; Reiner M; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115002. PubMed ID: 29714714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files.
Teke T; Bergman AM; Kwa W; Gill B; Duzenli C; Popescu IA
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 20175472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical approach for pretreatment verification of IMRT with flattening filter free(FFF) beams using Varian Portal Dosimetry.
Min S; Choi YE; Kwak J; Cho B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):4934. PubMed ID: 25679149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the modulation degrees of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.
Park SY; Kim JI; Chun M; Ahn H; Park JM
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30545396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):114-124. PubMed ID: 29508529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
