These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28292490)

  • 41. Handling Regional Variation in Health State Preferences within a Country.
    Pullenayegum EM; Sunderland KM; Johnson JA; Xie F;
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 27270112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Recall of health-related quality of life: how does memory affect the SF-6D in patients with psoriasis or multiple sclerosis? A prospective observational study in Germany.
    Topp J; Andrees V; Heesen C; Augustin M; Blome C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032859. PubMed ID: 31753898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life.
    Kopec JA; Willison KD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 56(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 12767408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Agreement between the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) interview and a paper-administered adaption.
    Burckhardt M; Fleischer S; Berg A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 32276603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms.
    Michel YA; Augestad LA; Barra M; Rand K
    Qual Life Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1129-1143. PubMed ID: 30506179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quality of life in epilepsy: comparison of four preference measures.
    Stavem K
    Epilepsy Res; 1998 Feb; 29(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9551782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Development and Valuation of a Preference-Weighted Measure in Age-Related Macular Degeneration From the Vision Impairment in Low Luminance Questionnaire: A MACUSTAR Report.
    Rowen D; Carlton J; Terheyden JH; Finger RP; Wickramasekera N; Brazier J;
    Value Health; 2024 May; 27(5):642-654. PubMed ID: 38369283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications.
    Sintonen H
    Ann Med; 2001 Jul; 33(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 11491191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Utility-Based Instruments for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.
    Li L; Nguyen KH; Comans T; Scuffham P
    Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):471-481. PubMed ID: 29680105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used?
    Schuck P
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Apr; 13(3):571-86. PubMed ID: 15130022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preference-Based Quality of Life Values in Coronary Heart Disease.
    Stevanović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Kampinga MA; Krabbe PF; Postma MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152030. PubMed ID: 27011260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Valuing Health Status in the First Year of Life: The Infant Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument.
    Jabrayilov R; Vermeulen KM; Detzel P; Dainelli L; van Asselt ADI; Krabbe PFM
    Value Health; 2019 Jun; 22(6):721-727. PubMed ID: 31198190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling.
    Hakim Z; Pathak DS
    Health Econ; 1999 Mar; 8(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 10342724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of quality of life in lung transplantation using a simple generic tool.
    Anyanwu AC; McGuire A; Rogers CA; Murday AJ
    Thorax; 2001 Mar; 56(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 11182015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it.
    Brazier J; Rowen D; Karimi M; Peasgood T; Tsuchiya A; Ratcliffe J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jul; 19(6):881-891. PubMed ID: 29022120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validation of the howRu and howRwe questionnaires at the individual patient level.
    Hendriks SH; Rutgers J; van Dijk PR; Groenier KH; Bilo HJ; Kleefstra N; Kocks JW; van Hateren KJ; Blanker MH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Oct; 15():447. PubMed ID: 26431695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hungarian population norms for the 15D generic preference-accompanied health status measure.
    Nikl A; Janssen MF; Brodszky V; Rencz F
    Qual Life Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 37707653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures.
    Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Revicki DA
    Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 8161981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway.
    Nord E
    Health Policy; 1991 Jun; 18(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 10112299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status.
    Sanderson K; Andrews G; Corry J; Lapsley H
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Sep; 13(7):1255-64. PubMed ID: 15473504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.