262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28292787)
21. The genetic architecture of low-temperature adaptation in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
García-Ríos E; Morard M; Parts L; Liti G; Guillamón JM
BMC Genomics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):159. PubMed ID: 28196526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Flocculation and transcriptional adaptation to fermentation conditions in a recombinant wine yeast strain defective for KNR4/SMI1.
Penacho V; Blondin B; Valero E; Gonzalez R
Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 22065482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative analysis of fermentation and enzyme expression profiles among industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Uebayashi K; Shimizu H; Matsuda F
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 102(16):7071-7081. PubMed ID: 29882163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast populations in a cold region in Argentinean Patagonia. A study at different fermentation scales.
Lopes CA; van Broock M; Querol A; Caballero AC
J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 93(4):608-15. PubMed ID: 12234344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mapping genetic variants underlying differences in the central nitrogen metabolism in fermenter yeasts.
Jara M; Cubillos FA; García V; Salinas F; Aguilera O; Liti G; Martínez C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86533. PubMed ID: 24466135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR studies during Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcoholic fermentation in the presence of sulfite.
Nadai C; Campanaro S; Giacomini A; Corich V
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 215():49-56. PubMed ID: 26325600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Molecular and enological characterization of a natural Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae hybrid.
Pérez-Torrado R; González SS; Combina M; Barrio E; Querol A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 204():101-10. PubMed ID: 25867085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. FLO gene-dependent phenotypes in industrial wine yeast strains.
Govender P; Bester M; Bauer FF
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Apr; 86(3):931-45. PubMed ID: 20013339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Co-Flocculation of Yeast Species, a New Mechanism to Govern Population Dynamics in Microbial Ecosystems.
Rossouw D; Bagheri B; Setati ME; Bauer FF
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136249. PubMed ID: 26317200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genomic expression program of Saccharomyces cerevisiae along a mixed-culture wine fermentation with Hanseniaspora guilliermondii.
Barbosa C; Mendes-Faia A; Lage P; Mira NP; Mendes-Ferreira A
Microb Cell Fact; 2015 Aug; 14():124. PubMed ID: 26314747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic signatures of adaptation to wine biological ageing conditions in biofilm-forming flor yeasts.
Coi AL; Bigey F; Mallet S; Marsit S; Zara G; Gladieux P; Galeote V; Budroni M; Dequin S; Legras JL
Mol Ecol; 2017 Apr; 26(7):2150-2166. PubMed ID: 28192619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Expression levels and patterns of glycolytic yeast genes during wine fermentation.
Puig S; Pérez-Ortín JE
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 23(2):300-3. PubMed ID: 10930084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals similarities and dissimilarities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains response to nitrogen availability.
Barbosa C; García-Martínez J; Pérez-Ortín JE; Mendes-Ferreira A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122709. PubMed ID: 25884705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Different genetic responses to oenological conditions between a flocculent wine yeast and its FLO5 deleted strain: Insights from the transcriptome.
Di Gianvito P; Tesnière C; Suzzi G; Blondin B; Tofalo R
Food Res Int; 2018 Dec; 114():178-186. PubMed ID: 30361014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments.
Dunn B; Richter C; Kvitek DJ; Pugh T; Sherlock G
Genome Res; 2012 May; 22(5):908-24. PubMed ID: 22369888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Distinct Domestication Trajectories in Top-Fermenting Beer Yeasts and Wine Yeasts.
Gonçalves M; Pontes A; Almeida P; Barbosa R; Serra M; Libkind D; Hutzler M; Gonçalves P; Sampaio JP
Curr Biol; 2016 Oct; 26(20):2750-2761. PubMed ID: 27720622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dominance of wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains over S. kudriavzevii in industrial fermentation competitions is related to an acceleration of nutrient uptake and utilization.
Alonso-Del-Real J; Pérez-Torrado R; Querol A; Barrio E
Environ Microbiol; 2019 May; 21(5):1627-1644. PubMed ID: 30672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review.
Marsit S; Dequin S
FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 Nov; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 26205244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of GAP1 gene in the nitrogen metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.
Chiva R; Baiges I; Mas A; Guillamon JM
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 107(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 19302302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast.
Querol A; Fernández-Espinar MT; del Olmo Ml; Barrio E
Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Sep; 86(1-2):3-10. PubMed ID: 12892918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
